Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22401–22410
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Many articles focused on Riverdance rather than the petitioner. The Irish Dancing and Culture Magazine article was about the petitioner's make-up business, not her dancing. The remaining publications were local or regional in scope and did not qualify as major media. The emails regarding broadcast interviews were on local TV and radio stations.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Many articles focused on Riverdance rather than the petitioner. The Irish Dancing and Culture Magazine article was about the petitioner's make-up business, not her dancing. The remaining publications were local or regional in scope and did not qualify as major media. The emails regarding broadcast interviews were on local TV and radio stations. Counsel's 'comparable evidence' argument was a mischaracterization of the policy memorandum.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_05_B2203; source_row=15351 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that Riverdance has a distinguished reputation and that the petitioner's Dance Captain role was leading or critical for Riverdance. However, the regulation requires the plural 'organizations' or 'establishments,' and the letters from the other two organizations used conclusory language and failed to establish that either had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that Riverdance has a distinguished reputation and that the petitioner's Dance Captain role was leading or critical for Riverdance. However, the regulation requires the plural 'organizations' or 'establishments,' and the letters from the other two organizations used conclusory language and failed to establish that either had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_05_B2203; source_row=15354 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The criterion is limited to the visual arts; performances by a performing artist do not qualify under this criterion. The petitioner is a performer, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The criterion is limited to the visual arts; performances by a performing artist do not qualify under this criterion. The petitioner is a performer, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_05_B2203; source_row=15353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters were vague, conclusory, and spoke primarily to future potential rather than demonstrated impact. Publications and conference presentations do not by themselves establish contributions of major significance. Eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and letters indicating potential future contributions are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters were vague, conclusory, and spoke primarily to future potential rather than demonstrated impact. Publications and conference presentations do not by themselves establish contributions of major significance. Eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and letters indicating potential future contributions are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_09_B2203; source_row=15371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the record lacked evidence that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. International attendance at a conference does not establish that a prize is nationally or internationally recognized. An award limited to pre-college students does not equate to an award for excellence in the petitioner's field of endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the record lacked evidence that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. International attendance at a conference does not establish that a prize is nationally or internationally recognized. An award limited to pre-college students does not equate to an award for excellence in the petitioner's field of endeavor. The petitioner abandoned the TOCAB Institute award by failing to address it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_09_B2203; source_row=15368 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The single supporting letter was vague and only mentioned 'selection of the artists,' which could be based on factors unrelated to judging artistic work. Counsel's assertions are not evidence.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The single supporting letter was vague and only mentioned 'selection of the artists,' which could be based on factors unrelated to judging artistic work. Counsel's assertions are not evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_06_B2203; source_row=15358 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Union Latina certificate did not show first place and was restricted to artists without international exposure with no showing of national/international recognition. The Best Project Prize was national in scope but not shown to be nationally recognized in the field beyond the organizing entity.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Union Latina certificate did not show first place and was restricted to artists without international exposure with no showing of national/international recognition. The Best Project Prize was national in scope but not shown to be nationally recognized in the field beyond the organizing entity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_06_B2203; source_row=15356 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner relied on self-promotional materials and counsel's assertions without independent documentation. Being one of many artists whose works are sold or displayed at a gallery does not amount to a leading or critical role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner relied on self-promotional materials and counsel's assertions without independent documentation. Being one of many artists whose works are sold or displayed at a gallery does not amount to a leading or critical role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_06_B2203; source_row=15360 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_10_B2203; source_row=15379 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c