Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22421–22430
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
What the decision said
The AAO did not address this criterion due to summary dismissal, noting counsel merely repeated prior claims without identifying specific errors in the director's analysis.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not address this criterion due to summary dismissal, noting counsel merely repeated prior claims without identifying specific errors in the director's analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_04_B2203; source_row=15341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO did not address this criterion due to summary dismissal; notably, no additional documentation was actually attached despite counsel's reference to such.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not address this criterion due to summary dismissal; notably, no additional documentation was actually attached despite counsel's reference to such.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_04_B2203; source_row=15343 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
On appeal, the petitioner did not specifically claim eligibility for this criterion or point to specific examples of original artistic contributions of major significance, so the AAO deemed the issue abandoned.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
On appeal, the petitioner did not specifically claim eligibility for this criterion or point to specific examples of original artistic contributions of major significance, so the AAO deemed the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_03_B2203; source_row=15332 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's initial evidence satisfies this criterion, while declining to consider post-filing exhibition evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's initial evidence satisfies this criterion, while declining to consider post-filing exhibition evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_03_B2203; source_row=15333 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's finding. The San Jose Mercury News article was about California gift ideas and only briefly mentioned the petitioner; the Chicago Sun-Times article was about an exhibition, not the petitioner; the Naperville Sun article did not even mention the petitioner; the Getty symposium presentation was not about the petitioner and not shown to be published material in major media.…
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding. The San Jose Mercury News article was about California gift ideas and only briefly mentioned the petitioner; the Chicago Sun-Times article was about an exhibition, not the petitioner; the Naperville Sun article did not even mention the petitioner; the Getty symposium presentation was not about the petitioner and not shown to be published material in major media. Wikipedia was not a reliable source to establish major media status. The appeal-stage Korean newspaper article post-dated the filing date and could not establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_03_B2203; source_row=15331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner's citation record was limited, she offered no comparative citation figures to contextualize low citations as normal for experimental physicists, her peer review participation was not a rare privilege (she was one of 1,117 reviewers for a single journal), and her HTPD conference invitation post-dated the petition filing.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's citation record was limited, she offered no comparative citation figures to contextualize low citations as normal for experimental physicists, her peer review participation was not a rare privilege (she was one of 1,117 reviewers for a single journal), and her HTPD conference invitation post-dated the petition filing. There was no evidence of implementation of her work beyond her own collaborative projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_03_B5203; source_row=15337 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found witness letters generic and unsupported by specifics, rejected reliance on P-1A status as presumptive, and treated the late-introduced 'innovative hand techniques' claim as an impermissible material change after filing under Matter of Katigbak and Matter of Izummi.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found witness letters generic and unsupported by specifics, rejected reliance on P-1A status as presumptive, and treated the late-introduced 'innovative hand techniques' claim as an impermissible material change after filing under Matter of Katigbak and Matter of Izummi.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-10-22_01_B5203; source_row=15327 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c