Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22651–22660

EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed the director's final-merits conclusion that the petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's final-merits conclusion that the petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_05_B2203; source_row=15066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner argued comparable evidence should apply since athletics is not artistic, but AAO held comparable evidence is not available where the regulatory criteria readily apply, and noted petitioner had submitted evidence under five other categories.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner argued comparable evidence should apply since athletics is not artistic, but AAO held comparable evidence is not available where the regulatory criteria readily apply, and noted petitioner had submitted evidence under five other categories.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_05_B2203; source_row=15063
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

minimum educational requirement per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

Since the beneficiary lacks a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. bachelor's degree, he does not meet the minimum educational requirements specified on the Form ETA 750 for the senior programmer analyst position.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Since the beneficiary lacks a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. bachelor's degree, he does not meet the minimum educational requirements specified on the Form ETA 750 for the senior programmer analyst position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_01_B5203; source_row=15043
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification job requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that because the beneficiary lacks a qualifying baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, he does not meet the educational job requirement on the labor certification, which is an independent ground for denial.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that because the beneficiary lacks a qualifying baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, he does not meet the educational job requirement on the labor certification, which is an independent ground for denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B5203; source_row=15049
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that letters from association officials, athletes, and the U.S. Olympic Committee demonstrated the beneficiary coaches internationally competitive athletes who competed at World Championships, coached a national champion, and is recognized as having superior biathlon knowledge compared to other U.S. coaches, establishing sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that letters from association officials, athletes, and the U.S. Olympic Committee demonstrated the beneficiary coaches internationally competitive athletes who competed at World Championships, coached a national champion, and is recognized as having superior biathlon knowledge compared to other U.S. coaches, establishing sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=15041
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

What the decision said

The petitioner did not contest the director's finding on appeal, so AAO considers the issue abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not contest the director's finding on appeal, so AAO considers the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_04_B2203; source_row=15051
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concurs with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO concurs with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_04_B2203; source_row=15054
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concurs with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the display criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concurs with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the display criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_04_B2203; source_row=15056
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing to work in the area of extraordinary ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO finds petitioner's statement about opening a kite-making institute lacks the detail required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds petitioner's statement about opening a kite-making institute lacks the detail required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_04_B2203; source_row=15058
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification job requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS must read and apply the plain language of the labor certification exactly as completed by the employer. The labor certification at Part H line 9 expressly states that a foreign educational equivalent is not acceptable. Because the beneficiary holds only a foreign degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated job requirements regardless of whether the entry was made in error.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS must read and apply the plain language of the labor certification exactly as completed by the employer. The labor certification at Part H line 9 expressly states that a foreign educational equivalent is not acceptable. Because the beneficiary holds only a foreign degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated job requirements regardless of whether the entry was made in error.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_03_B5203; source_row=15050
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment