Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22711–22720
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found awards evidence was self-promotional or not in the petitioner's current field; published material lacked national reach; judging was only preliminary rounds; expert letters did not establish major significance contributions; salary evidence was deficient; and no evidence showed the petitioner had risen to the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found awards evidence was self-promotional or not in the petitioner's current field; published material lacked national reach; judging was only preliminary rounds; expert letters did not establish major significance contributions; salary evidence was deficient; and no evidence showed the petitioner had risen to the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-23_01_B2203; source_row=14983 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Petitioner did not demonstrate that the regulatory criteria were not readily applicable to his occupation, a prerequisite for submitting comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), so no comparable evidence could be considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not demonstrate that the regulatory criteria were not readily applicable to his occupation, a prerequisite for submitting comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), so no comparable evidence could be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-23_01_B2203; source_row=14982 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the new evidence did not establish national scope: the journal letter does not report new original research and there is no proof the petitioner authored it; the Cancer Liaison Physician appointment letter shows responsibilities limited to the petitioner's own employing institution.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the new evidence did not establish national scope: the journal letter does not report new original research and there is no proof the petitioner authored it; the Cancer Liaison Physician appointment letter shows responsibilities limited to the petitioner's own employing institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-23_04_B5203; source_row=15013 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO reaffirmed that the petitioner's witness letters, drawn primarily from a single institution, did not establish influence beyond ETSU, and that uncorroborated witness claims do not take on the weight of documented fact.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reaffirmed that the petitioner's witness letters, drawn primarily from a single institution, did not establish influence beyond ETSU, and that uncorroborated witness claims do not take on the weight of documented fact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-23_04_B5203; source_row=15014 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the director's characterization of the letters as general, finding many letters described the work in fine detail. AAO held the director failed to give due consideration to objective citation evidence showing the petitioner's ongoing influence on her specialty.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director's characterization of the letters as general, finding many letters described the work in fine detail. AAO held the director failed to give due consideration to objective citation evidence showing the petitioner's ongoing influence on her specialty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-23_01_B5203; source_row=14986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible art displayed at exhibitions or showcases; radio performances do not qualify as artistic exhibitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible art displayed at exhibitions or showcases; radio performances do not qualify as artistic exhibitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-19_01_B2203; source_row=14964 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c