Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22751–22760

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO declined to consider the new submissions because none was both new evidence and relevant to the facts as they existed at the November 2007 filing date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider the new submissions because none was both new evidence and relevant to the facts as they existed at the November 2007 filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_05_B2203; source_row=14949
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner offered no new evidence supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner offered no new evidence supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_05_B2203; source_row=14948
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other100 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards for excellence

What the decision said

The petitioner explicitly stated on appeal that she 'no longer claim[s] this criterion,' so the AAO concluded that she had abandoned the issue by failing to timely raise it on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner explicitly stated on appeal that she 'no longer claim[s] this criterion,' so the AAO concluded that she had abandoned the issue by failing to timely raise it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_02_B2203; source_row=14927
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other100 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner's authorship of four articles and a handbook chapter in professional or major trade publications satisfies this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner's authorship of four articles and a handbook chapter in professional or major trade publications satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_02_B2203; source_row=14930
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

Based on a review of the record, the petitioner submitted sufficient documentation demonstrating authorship of two scholarly articles in professional publications, minimally meeting this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Based on a review of the record, the petitioner submitted sufficient documentation demonstrating authorship of two scholarly articles in professional publications, minimally meeting this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_01_B2203; source_row=14921
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The director found witness letters insufficient to show field-wide impact. The AAO agreed, finding that the letters were vague, primarily from school colleagues, discussed skills and small-scale educational impact rather than impact on the musical field as a whole, and that mere assertions about commercial downloads were uncorroborated and in any event fell under a separate commercial success criterion.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The director found witness letters insufficient to show field-wide impact. The AAO agreed, finding that the letters were vague, primarily from school colleagues, discussed skills and small-scale educational impact rather than impact on the musical field as a whole, and that mere assertions about commercial downloads were uncorroborated and in any event fell under a separate commercial success criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_07_B2203; source_row=14954
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO confirmed that the petitioner's 2009 net income ($6,742) and net current assets ($27,509) were both far below the proffered wage of $76,294. Reliance on gross receipts, bank statements, and anticipated future income from the beneficiary was rejected. The totality of circumstances, including multiple simultaneously pending petitions, further undermined the petitioner's ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO confirmed that the petitioner's 2009 net income ($6,742) and net current assets ($27,509) were both far below the proffered wage of $76,294. Reliance on gross receipts, bank statements, and anticipated future income from the beneficiary was rejected. The totality of circumstances, including multiple simultaneously pending petitions, further undermined the petitioner's ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=14926
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay via net income

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 1120S returns showed net income of $47 in 2008 and -$12,261 in 2009, both far below the $68,473.60 proffered wage. Net current assets were also deeply negative. The shareholder compensation-forfeiture argument failed for lack of individual financial documentation, and bank statements were not among the enumerated acceptable evidence types.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 1120S returns showed net income of $47 in 2008 and -$12,261 in 2009, both far below the $68,473.60 proffered wage. Net current assets were also deeply negative. The shareholder compensation-forfeiture argument failed for lack of individual financial documentation, and bank statements were not among the enumerated acceptable evidence types.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_02_B5203; source_row=14932
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

Five years of experience as a controller per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The employment letters contradicted each other and conflicted with both the beneficiary's ETA Form 9089 representations and her Form G-325A. The work experience descriptions were too vague to establish the required experience, and the inconsistencies were not explained by competent objective evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The employment letters contradicted each other and conflicted with both the beneficiary's ETA Form 9089 representations and her Form G-325A. The work experience descriptions were too vague to establish the required experience, and the inconsistencies were not explained by competent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-17_02_B5203; source_row=14933
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Job offer requires a professional holding an advanced degree or equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO held that Kellogg language cannot be used to elevate alternative job requirements that are facially less than a bachelor's plus five years of progressive experience to the advanced degree professional level. The form lists 'other' education plus 5 years of experience as the alternative, which is below the minimum.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO held that Kellogg language cannot be used to elevate alternative job requirements that are facially less than a bachelor's plus five years of progressive experience to the advanced degree professional level. The form lists 'other' education plus 5 years of experience as the alternative, which is below the minimum.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-16_03_B5203; source_row=14906
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment