Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22781–22790
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Evidence submitted on appeal after NOID notice was rejected. The bank account balance and real estate appraisal also post-dated the filing date. In any event, the documents failed to demonstrate high salary in relation to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Evidence submitted on appeal after NOID notice was rejected. The bank account balance and real estate appraisal also post-dated the filing date. In any event, the documents failed to demonstrate high salary in relation to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-13_01_B2203; source_row=14890 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most submissions lacked required bibliographic elements (title, date, author). Articles about the petitioner's clients are not 'about the alien.' Translations were deficient. No evidence was provided that the publications qualified as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most submissions lacked required bibliographic elements (title, date, author). Articles about the petitioner's clients are not 'about the alien.' Translations were deficient. No evidence was provided that the publications qualified as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-13_01_B2203; source_row=14888 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that evidence of the display of the beneficiary's designs in two or more fashion shows and/or competitions is sufficient to satisfy the plain language requirements of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that evidence of the display of the beneficiary's designs in two or more fashion shows and/or competitions is sufficient to satisfy the plain language requirements of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-13_02_B2203; source_row=14896 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the website screenshots were primarily about the petitioner, lacked required author information, and were not demonstrated to be major media. The Southern Spirit article was about the petitioner but failed to establish the publication as major media. The book chapter was about football sponsorship generally, not about the petitioner.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
None of the website screenshots were primarily about the petitioner, lacked required author information, and were not demonstrated to be major media. The Southern Spirit article was about the petitioner but failed to establish the publication as major media. The book chapter was about football sponsorship generally, not about the petitioner. Even if the Southern Spirit article qualified, the criterion requires published material in more than one publication (plural language).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-12_04_B2203; source_row=14880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The FIFA certificate submitted on appeal does not state the petitioner received the 'Volunteer of the Year' award; it merely acknowledges his contributions and enthusiasm. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in his field. Additionally, the criterion requires more than one award (plural language), and only one was claimed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The FIFA certificate submitted on appeal does not state the petitioner received the 'Volunteer of the Year' award; it merely acknowledges his contributions and enthusiasm. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in his field. Additionally, the criterion requires more than one award (plural language), and only one was claimed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-12_04_B2203; source_row=14879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
There was no evidence showing the book and broadsheet equate to professional or major trade publications. Additionally, the materials were written for novice photographers and there was no evidence they were peer-reviewed, contained references to sources, or were otherwise considered scholarly articles.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
There was no evidence showing the book and broadsheet equate to professional or major trade publications. Additionally, the materials were written for novice photographers and there was no evidence they were peer-reviewed, contained references to sources, or were otherwise considered scholarly articles.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-12_03_B2203; source_row=14872 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO declined to consider evidence raised for the first time on appeal after the director had flagged the deficiency in a NOID. Additionally, the letters did not state the petitioner held 'membership' in the museums, and no documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) showed the institutions required outstanding achievements of members as judged by recognized experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to consider evidence raised for the first time on appeal after the director had flagged the deficiency in a NOID. Additionally, the letters did not state the petitioner held 'membership' in the museums, and no documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) showed the institutions required outstanding achievements of members as judged by recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-12_03_B2203; source_row=14868 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c