Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22821–22830

NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets master's degree requirement on ETA Form 9089

Why the evidence was persuasive

With the DESS transcript submitted on appeal and EDGE information, the AAO found the DESS more likely than not comparable to a U.S. master's degree, satisfying the labor certification requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
With the DESS transcript submitted on appeal and EDGE information, the AAO found the DESS more likely than not comparable to a U.S. master's degree, satisfying the labor certification requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_01_B5203; source_row=14848
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

Wages paid to the beneficiary exceeded the proffered wage, establishing continuing ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Wages paid to the beneficiary exceeded the proffered wage, establishing continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_01_B5203; source_row=14849
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Advanced degree or equivalent qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO relied on AACRAO EDGE data showing that a three-year Indian B.S. equals only 2–3 years of U.S. study and that an Indian MBA equals only a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted private credential evaluation was found unpersuasive because it lacked substantiation for its credit-hour assignments and was not peer-reviewed. The beneficiary's total education therefore equates to a U.S.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO relied on AACRAO EDGE data showing that a three-year Indian B.S. equals only 2–3 years of U.S. study and that an Indian MBA equals only a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted private credential evaluation was found unpersuasive because it lacked substantiation for its credit-hour assignments and was not peer-reviewed. The beneficiary's total education therefore equates to a U.S. bachelor's degree, which falls short of the master's degree required by the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=14836
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO had previously found the membership evidence insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner did not demonstrate the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO had previously found the membership evidence insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner did not demonstrate the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_01_B2203; source_row=14831
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO had previously found the published materials insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner did not demonstrate the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO had previously found the published materials insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner did not demonstrate the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_01_B2203; source_row=14832
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

member of the professions holding an advanced degree or foreign equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO preferred the peer-reviewed EDGE database, which equates a three-year Indian B.Sc. to two-three years of U.S. study and an Indian MBA to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation was unpersuasive because its credit assignments were unsubstantiated and not peer-reviewed.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO preferred the peer-reviewed EDGE database, which equates a three-year Indian B.Sc. to two-three years of U.S. study and an Indian MBA to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluation was unpersuasive because its credit assignments were unsubstantiated and not peer-reviewed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_02_B5203; source_row=14837
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Degree in the required field of study

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO identified independently on appeal that the beneficiary's degree is in applied physics, not in computer information systems as required by the labor certification. A degree in the wrong field does not satisfy the requirement even if it is otherwise equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO identified independently on appeal that the beneficiary's degree is in applied physics, not in computer information systems as required by the labor certification. A degree in the wrong field does not satisfy the requirement even if it is otherwise equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_03_B5203; source_row=14839
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Five years of progressive experience in the specialty

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found independently on appeal that the sole work experience letter in the record was deficient because it did not include the name or address of the author as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1), and therefore the beneficiary failed to demonstrate five years of progressive experience by the priority date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found independently on appeal that the sole work experience letter in the record was deficient because it did not include the name or address of the author as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1), and therefore the beneficiary failed to demonstrate five years of progressive experience by the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_03_B5203; source_row=14840
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO had previously found the evidence insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner merely disagreed with the finding without demonstrating an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO had previously found the evidence insufficient and, on motion, found the petitioner merely disagreed with the finding without demonstrating an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_01_B2203; source_row=14830
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage as of priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the director's denial was improper because it relied on pre-priority-date evidence. The relevant financial documents for 2010 and 2011 were likely unavailable at the time of adjudication, so the matter must be remanded for the director to solicit and consider that evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the director's denial was improper because it relied on pre-priority-date evidence. The relevant financial documents for 2010 and 2011 were likely unavailable at the time of adjudication, so the matter must be remanded for the director to solicit and consider that evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-10_06_B5203; source_row=14842
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment