Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22851–22860

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

Counsel explicitly stated on appeal that petitioner does not claim to satisfy this criterion, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Counsel explicitly stated on appeal that petitioner does not claim to satisfy this criterion, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B2203; source_row=14780
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

The AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of three types of qualifying evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of three types of qualifying evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B2203; source_row=14786
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

The AAO considered this criterion abandoned because neither counsel nor the petitioner fully briefed the issue on appeal, providing no additional evidence or arguments identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The AAO considered this criterion abandoned because neither counsel nor the petitioner fully briefed the issue on appeal, providing no additional evidence or arguments identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B2203; source_row=14783
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The second accountant letter was unsigned and could not be considered. The first letter lacked corroborating tax records, an explanation of the methodology for the average income figure, and failed to isolate singing income from teacher/instructor salary. The record did not demonstrate reliable earnings evidence showing high salary or significantly high remuneration in comparison with others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The second accountant letter was unsigned and could not be considered. The first letter lacked corroborating tax records, an explanation of the methodology for the average income figure, and failed to isolate singing income from teacher/instructor salary. The record did not demonstrate reliable earnings evidence showing high salary or significantly high remuneration in comparison with others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B2203; source_row=14784
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied criterion iv.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied criterion iv.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B2203; source_row=14782
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this issue independently on appeal. The petitioner filed multiple I-140s requiring proof of ability to pay combined wages, but the record lacked the necessary documentation to establish such ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue independently on appeal. The petitioner filed multiple I-140s requiring proof of ability to pay combined wages, but the record lacked the necessary documentation to establish such ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=14778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification required a master's degree with no alternate combination. EDGE/AACRAO resources indicated the beneficiary's three-year B.S. was comparable to two to three years of U.S. university study, and the MBA was comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The private evaluations were not persuasive because they lacked explanation of credit-hour methodology and were not peer-reviewed.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification required a master's degree with no alternate combination. EDGE/AACRAO resources indicated the beneficiary's three-year B.S. was comparable to two to three years of U.S. university study, and the MBA was comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The private evaluations were not persuasive because they lacked explanation of credit-hour methodology and were not peer-reviewed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=14777
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary possesses qualifications required by labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary holds only a bachelor's degree; the credential evaluation combining education and experience to equate to a master's degree is impermissible because the ETA Form 9089 specifies a master's degree in business administration and does not allow substitution through a combination of education and experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary holds only a bachelor's degree; the credential evaluation combining education and experience to equate to a master's degree is impermissible because the ETA Form 9089 specifies a master's degree in business administration and does not allow substitution through a combination of education and experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B5203; source_row=14791
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Wages actually paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The wages paid to the beneficiary were substantially below the proffered wage in both 2009 and 2010, creating large deficiencies that must be covered by net income or net current assets.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The wages paid to the beneficiary were substantially below the proffered wage in both 2009 and 2010, creating large deficiencies that must be covered by net income or net current assets.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B5203; source_row=14787
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of circumstances (Sonegawa factors)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO rejected all of counsel's totality-of-circumstances arguments as unsupported by documentary evidence or legally insufficient. Bank statements are not an enumerated form of ability-to-pay evidence and do not show sustainable capacity; gross receipts are irrelevant because net income controls; the director replacement argument was speculative and unsupported; and future anticipated growth cannot substitute for demonstrate…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO rejected all of counsel's totality-of-circumstances arguments as unsupported by documentary evidence or legally insufficient. Bank statements are not an enumerated form of ability-to-pay evidence and do not show sustainable capacity; gross receipts are irrelevant because net income controls; the director replacement argument was speculative and unsupported; and future anticipated growth cannot substitute for demonstrated ability as of the priority date. Additionally, the simultaneous filing of another immigrant petition further undermined the petitioner's ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_02_B5203; source_row=14790
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment