Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22871–22880

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Retained earnings as ability-to-pay evidence

Why AAO was not persuaded

Retained earnings are cumulative and therefore duplicative of net income and net current assets. Moreover, retained earnings generally represent non-cash shareholder equity and do not represent funds readily available to pay wages.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Retained earnings are cumulative and therefore duplicative of net income and net current assets. Moreover, retained earnings generally represent non-cash shareholder equity and do not represent funds readily available to pay wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_07_B5203; source_row=14805
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Foreign degree equivalency to U.S. master's degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Baruch College evaluations unpersuasive because they failed to explain credit-hour methodology, were not peer-reviewed, and conceded the Indian system omits components of U.S. programs (e.g., electives). AAO preferred EDGE (AACRAO), which peer-reviewed sources indicate the Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. study and the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Baruch College evaluations unpersuasive because they failed to explain credit-hour methodology, were not peer-reviewed, and conceded the Indian system omits components of U.S. programs (e.g., electives). AAO preferred EDGE (AACRAO), which peer-reviewed sources indicate the Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. study and the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. Thus the beneficiary's combined credentials equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree at most, not a master's degree as required by the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-05_03_B5203; source_row=14799
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The evidence did not distinguish the petitioner's instructor role from any other instructor's role at the event, and no evidence showed the organizations had a distinguished reputation. No documentation explained how the petitioner's role within the organizational hierarchy was leading or critical, and counsel's unsupported assertions do not constitute evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The evidence did not distinguish the petitioner's instructor role from any other instructor's role at the event, and no evidence showed the organizations had a distinguished reputation. No documentation explained how the petitioner's role within the organizational hierarchy was leading or critical, and counsel's unsupported assertions do not constitute evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_03_B2203; source_row=14774
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

The reference letters were vague and solicited, failing to identify specific original contributions or how contributions influenced the field at a level of major significance. The petitioner's activities as a skilled instructor and competitor do not equate to original contributions of major significance. No evidence showed widespread adoption of any methods or equipment attributed to the petitioner.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The reference letters were vague and solicited, failing to identify specific original contributions or how contributions influenced the field at a level of major significance. The petitioner's activities as a skilled instructor and competitor do not equate to original contributions of major significance. No evidence showed widespread adoption of any methods or equipment attributed to the petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_03_B2203; source_row=14773
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The certificates show achievement but are not indicative of membership; no documentation was submitted regarding the requirements of the 7th and 8th Dans, no proof of membership in the associations, and no evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. Counsel's unsupported assertions do not constitute evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The certificates show achievement but are not indicative of membership; no documentation was submitted regarding the requirements of the 7th and 8th Dans, no proof of membership in the associations, and no evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. Counsel's unsupported assertions do not constitute evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_03_B2203; source_row=14770
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

Counsel merely reiterated the awards without responding to the director's specific concerns about national or international recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Counsel merely reiterated the awards without responding to the director's specific concerns about national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_02_B2203; source_row=14764
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

published material in professional or major trade publications

Why AAO was not persuaded

Counsel merely reiterated authorship without providing any new evidence regarding the publications in which the articles appeared.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Counsel merely reiterated authorship without providing any new evidence regarding the publications in which the articles appeared.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_02_B2203; source_row=14766
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Counsel merely reiterated the memberships and resubmitted background material without submitting evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Counsel merely reiterated the memberships and resubmitted background material without submitting evidence that the associations require outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_02_B2203; source_row=14765
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner did not submit the requested tax returns, audited financial statements, or W-2/1099 forms in response to the NOID.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not submit the requested tax returns, audited financial statements, or W-2/1099 forms in response to the NOID.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_02_B5203; source_row=14769
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

Foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the director that the beneficiary's three-year Indian bachelor's degree, alone or combined with ICAI certification, does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree to a four-year U.S. baccalaureate. AACRAO EDGE confirms that the ICAI credential is not a degree from a college or university. The evaluations submitted were not persuasive due to lack of methodology and internal inconsistencies.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the beneficiary's three-year Indian bachelor's degree, alone or combined with ICAI certification, does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree to a four-year U.S. baccalaureate. AACRAO EDGE confirms that the ICAI credential is not a degree from a college or university. The evaluations submitted were not persuasive due to lack of methodology and internal inconsistencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-02_04_B5203; source_row=14776
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment