Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Net income sufficient to cover proffered wage across all pending petitions
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although net income exceeded $100,000 in 2006–2008 for the single beneficiary, the petitioner had filed hundreds of immigrant and non-immigrant petitions and therefore must demonstrate ability to pay proffered wages to all simultaneously pending beneficiaries. The spreadsheet showed many beneficiaries were not paid their proffered wages, creating a substantial aggregate shortfall.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although net income exceeded $100,000 in 2006–2008 for the single beneficiary, the petitioner had filed hundreds of immigrant and non-immigrant petitions and therefore must demonstrate ability to pay proffered wages to all simultaneously pending beneficiaries. The spreadsheet showed many beneficiaries were not paid their proffered wages, creating a substantial aggregate shortfall. Gross receipts are not a permissible basis for ability-to-pay determinations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-27_01_B5203; source_row=14756 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Doctor of Divinity is an academic degree, not a prize or award for excellence. The church and organizational awards were institutional recognition from the presenting bodies, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards. No evidence was submitted showing national or widespread coverage of the awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Doctor of Divinity is an academic degree, not a prize or award for excellence. The church and organizational awards were institutional recognition from the presenting bodies, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards. No evidence was submitted showing national or widespread coverage of the awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=14743 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters were vague and conclusory, and the publisher's comments were self-serving. No documentary evidence showed the books attracted significant attention from independent religious scholars, were widely used in curricula, or otherwise had major significance. Speaking engagements at local church gatherings do not constitute original contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters were vague and conclusory, and the publisher's comments were self-serving. No documentary evidence showed the books attracted significant attention from independent religious scholars, were widely used in curricula, or otherwise had major significance. Speaking engagements at local church gatherings do not constitute original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=14745 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
No evidence showed Kingslight Chapel International had a distinguished reputation. Temporary guest-speaking engagements do not constitute a leading or critical role, and several post-dated the petition filing date. The organizations issuing invitations were not shown to have distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
No evidence showed Kingslight Chapel International had a distinguished reputation. Temporary guest-speaking engagements do not constitute a leading or critical role, and several post-dated the petition filing date. The organizations issuing invitations were not shown to have distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=14746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The church advertisement was not independent media reportage and lacked circulation evidence. The book reviews were about the petitioner's books, not about the petitioner himself, and several lacked required dates and publication titles. No circulation evidence was provided showing any of the outlets qualify as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The church advertisement was not independent media reportage and lacked circulation evidence. The book reviews were about the petitioner's books, not about the petitioner himself, and several lacked required dates and publication titles. No circulation evidence was provided showing any of the outlets qualify as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B2203; source_row=14744 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the petitioner offered no objective basis for comparison between his work and that of peers, and simply declared his work to merit a waiver without demonstrating his contributions significantly exceeded those of available U.S. workers.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner offered no objective basis for comparison between his work and that of peers, and simply declared his work to merit a waiver without demonstrating his contributions significantly exceeded those of available U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_10_B5203; source_row=14754 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner was newly established in 2009 with no evidence of historical growth, sound business reputation, or other factors that supported the ability to pay in Sonegawa. Bank statements are not an enumerated form of evidence and cannot demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. The petitioner also terminated the beneficiary's employment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner was newly established in 2009 with no evidence of historical growth, sound business reputation, or other factors that supported the ability to pay in Sonegawa. Bank statements are not an enumerated form of evidence and cannot demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. The petitioner also terminated the beneficiary's employment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B5203; source_row=14751 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via net income on federal tax returns
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2009 Schedule C shows a net loss of -$54,699, which is insufficient to pay the proffered wage. No 2010 or 2011 tax returns were submitted, and failure to submit requested evidence that precludes a material line of inquiry is grounds for denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2009 Schedule C shows a net loss of -$54,699, which is insufficient to pay the proffered wage. No 2010 or 2011 tax returns were submitted, and failure to submit requested evidence that precludes a material line of inquiry is grounds for denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B5203; source_row=14749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via wages actually paid to beneficiary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary received $52,203.06 in 2009 and $49,280.04 in 2010, far below the proffered wage of $124,800, so wages paid do not constitute prima facie proof of ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary received $52,203.06 in 2009 and $49,280.04 in 2010, far below the proffered wage of $124,800, so wages paid do not constitute prima facie proof of ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-25_01_B5203; source_row=14748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c