Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22911–22920

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO issued an RFE for tax returns, audited financial statements, and W-2/1099 forms for 2009–2011. The petitioner failed to respond within 45 days, and counsel confirmed inability to obtain the information. AAO dismissed the appeal on grounds of failure to respond to a material evidentiary request.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO issued an RFE for tax returns, audited financial statements, and W-2/1099 forms for 2009–2011. The petitioner failed to respond within 45 days, and counsel confirmed inability to obtain the information. AAO dismissed the appeal on grounds of failure to respond to a material evidentiary request.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_05_B5203; source_row=14736
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

job offer requires advanced degree professional

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the alternative requirements stated on the ETA Form 9089 (no degree, no work experience) are facially insufficient for EB-2 classification. AAO explained that Kellogg language does not transform inadequate alternative requirements into qualifying ones — the language is interpreted to mean any combination equal to or greater than the stated specifics, but those stated specifics themselves fall below the advanced d…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the alternative requirements stated on the ETA Form 9089 (no degree, no work experience) are facially insufficient for EB-2 classification. AAO explained that Kellogg language does not transform inadequate alternative requirements into qualifying ones — the language is interpreted to mean any combination equal to or greater than the stated specifics, but those stated specifics themselves fall below the advanced degree threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_09_B5203; source_row=14742
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets labor certification educational requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found USCIS must read the labor certification as written and may make a de novo determination of beneficiary qualifications. The labor certification required an MBA or foreign equivalent; the beneficiary's degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify and no foreign equivalent was shown.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found USCIS must read the labor certification as written and may make a de novo determination of beneficiary qualifications. The labor certification required an MBA or foreign equivalent; the beneficiary's degree from an unaccredited institution does not qualify and no foreign equivalent was shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_01_B5203; source_row=14730
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 2007 Form 1120S (Schedule K) showed net income of $37,903, which was below the proffered annual wage of $50,460.80. Counsel's argument for proration was rejected because no monthly income statements or pay stubs covering only the post-priority-date period were submitted.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2007 Form 1120S (Schedule K) showed net income of $37,903, which was below the proffered annual wage of $50,460.80. Counsel's argument for proration was rejected because no monthly income statements or pay stubs covering only the post-priority-date period were submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_08_B5203; source_row=14739
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Wages paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary did not claim to have worked for the petitioner on the ETA Form 9089, the director requested W-2s or pay stubs and none were provided, and no such evidence was submitted on appeal either.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary did not claim to have worked for the petitioner on the ETA Form 9089, the director requested W-2s or pay stubs and none were provided, and no such evidence was submitted on appeal either.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_08_B5203; source_row=14738
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of circumstances / overall business magnitude (Sonegawa)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner had been in business only approximately three years, employed only five workers, paid total wages of only $3,000 (about 6% of the proffered wage), paid officer compensation of only $21,000, and provided no evidence of historical growth, exceptional expenditures, or industry reputation that would support a finding of ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner had been in business only approximately three years, employed only five workers, paid total wages of only $3,000 (about 6% of the proffered wage), paid officer compensation of only $21,000, and provided no evidence of historical growth, exceptional expenditures, or industry reputation that would support a finding of ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_08_B5203; source_row=14741
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net current assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 2007 Form 1120S Schedule L showed net current assets of $24,829, which was insufficient to cover the proffered annual wage of $50,460.80.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2007 Form 1120S Schedule L showed net current assets of $24,829, which was insufficient to cover the proffered annual wage of $50,460.80.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_08_B5203; source_row=14740
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification educational requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO independently analyzed the labor certification's plain language, which required a master's degree with no alternate combination, and concluded the beneficiary's unaccredited MBA-F satisfies neither the U.S. master's degree nor the foreign equivalent requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO independently analyzed the labor certification's plain language, which required a master's degree with no alternate combination, and concluded the beneficiary's unaccredited MBA-F satisfies neither the U.S. master's degree nor the foreign equivalent requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_03_B5203; source_row=14735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification educational and experience requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification requires a master's degree in business administration with no experience substitution permitted. The beneficiary has neither a qualifying MBA nor a foreign equivalent master's degree. Work experience listings on the labor certification also conflict with documentation submitted in the record.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification requires a master's degree in business administration with no experience substitution permitted. The beneficiary has neither a qualifying MBA nor a foreign equivalent master's degree. Work experience listings on the labor certification also conflict with documentation submitted in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-22_02_B5203; source_row=14733
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Net current assets sufficient to cover proffered wage shortfall

Why AAO was not persuaded

Net current assets were $97,663 (2007), $66,911 (2008), $7,841 (2009), and $53,484 (2010). These were insufficient to cover the proffered wage shortfall in 2008, 2009, and 2010.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Net current assets were $97,663 (2007), $66,911 (2008), $7,841 (2009), and $53,484 (2010). These were insufficient to cover the proffered wage shortfall in 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-21_03_B5203; source_row=14716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment