Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22931–22940

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

The petitioner did not raise the leading or critical role criterion on appeal in counsel's 25-page brief, so the AAO concluded this issue was abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not raise the leading or critical role criterion on appeal in counsel's 25-page brief, so the AAO concluded this issue was abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=14706
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on his appointment as a judge for national-level grain industry competitions.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on his appointment as a judge for national-level grain industry competitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=14703
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage / realistic job offer

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO examined wages paid, net income, and net current assets and found each insufficient. Petitioner's replacement-worker theory was unsupported by documentation. No Sonegawa-type uncharacteristic circumstances were shown.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO examined wages paid, net income, and net current assets and found each insufficient. Petitioner's replacement-worker theory was unsupported by documentation. No Sonegawa-type uncharacteristic circumstances were shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-20_02_B5203; source_row=14709
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

valid signed ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the ETA Form 9089 was unsigned by the alien, rendering the petition unapprovable independent of the ability-to-pay deficiency.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the ETA Form 9089 was unsigned by the alien, rendering the petition unapprovable independent of the ability-to-pay deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-20_02_B5203; source_row=14710
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner paid the beneficiary below the proffered wage every year, had negative net income every year, and had zero net current assets every year on its tax returns. Members' personal assets cannot be attributed to the LLC. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence and cannot show sustainable ability to pay.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary below the proffered wage every year, had negative net income every year, and had zero net current assets every year on its tax returns. Members' personal assets cannot be attributed to the LLC. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence and cannot show sustainable ability to pay. The Masonry Masters argument was inapplicable because counsel did not show any difference between the proffered and prevailing wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_06_B5203; source_row=14689
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary holds advanced degree or equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

AACRAO EDGE indicates the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The credentials evaluator did not adequately explain her methodology. Without a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level, the beneficiary would need a baccalaureate equivalent plus five years of progressive experience, which is not established in the record.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AACRAO EDGE indicates the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The credentials evaluator did not adequately explain her methodology. Without a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level, the beneficiary would need a baccalaureate equivalent plus five years of progressive experience, which is not established in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_06_B5203; source_row=14690
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets labor certification education requirement

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification required a degree in computer science or engineering. The beneficiary's degrees are in computer applications, which AAO found to be a different field of study. This was an additional ground of ineligibility raised by AAO on appeal, not addressed by the director.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification required a degree in computer science or engineering. The beneficiary's degrees are in computer applications, which AAO found to be a different field of study. This was an additional ground of ineligibility raised by AAO on appeal, not addressed by the director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B5203; source_row=14699
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary was paid $25,000 in 2006 and $60,000 in 2007, both well below the $90,000 proffered wage. Net income was negative in both years and net current assets were zero. Stock options, bank statements, unaudited financials, and projected income arguments were all rejected. Under the Sonegawa totality analysis, the petitioner's short business history and consistent heavy losses precluded a finding of ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary was paid $25,000 in 2006 and $60,000 in 2007, both well below the $90,000 proffered wage. Net income was negative in both years and net current assets were zero. Stock options, bank statements, unaudited financials, and projected income arguments were all rejected. Under the Sonegawa totality analysis, the petitioner's short business history and consistent heavy losses precluded a finding of ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B5203; source_row=14698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO credited the petitioner's role as former General Manager of the France-Israel Chamber of Commerce and CEO of two companies, one selected by Inc. as among the fastest-growing private companies in the U.S.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO credited the petitioner's role as former General Manager of the France-Israel Chamber of Commerce and CEO of two companies, one selected by Inc. as among the fastest-growing private companies in the U.S.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B2203; source_row=14695
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found this criterion satisfied based on patents and corroborated reference letters from independent experts detailing the petitioner's specific contributions and their influence on the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on patents and corroborated reference letters from independent experts detailing the petitioner's specific contributions and their influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B2203; source_row=14694
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment