Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22941–22950
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found evidence that the petitioner has commanded significantly high remuneration for his services.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found evidence that the petitioner has commanded significantly high remuneration for his services.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B2203; source_row=14696 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of the business field, contrary to the director's determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of the business field, contrary to the director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_02_B2203; source_row=14697 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Effect of Kellogg language on advanced-degree qualification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO interpreted the Kellogg language as not allowing acceptance of lesser qualifications than the stated primary and alternative requirements; therefore the position remains qualifying for advanced-degree classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO interpreted the Kellogg language as not allowing acceptance of lesser qualifications than the stated primary and alternative requirements; therefore the position remains qualifying for advanced-degree classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-19_04_B5203; source_row=14700 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the principal supporting letter to be fraudulent, found no evidence anyone other than the petitioner practiced her style, and noted the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the principal supporting letter to be fraudulent, found no evidence anyone other than the petitioner practiced her style, and noted the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=14675 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the book had not been published as of filing, the newspaper paragraphs were about a competition rather than the petitioner and contained inconsistent/fraudulent content, the magazine article was published after filing and lacked evidence of major media status, and translations were uncertified.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the book had not been published as of filing, the newspaper paragraphs were about a competition rather than the petitioner and contained inconsistent/fraudulent content, the magazine article was published after filing and lacked evidence of major media status, and translations were uncertified.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=14674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found no evidence of the membership selection criteria for any of the associations, noted that an appointment to a committee is not membership, and rejected counsel's unsupported assertions about the associations' selectivity.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no evidence of the membership selection criteria for any of the associations, noted that an appointment to a committee is not membership, and rejected counsel's unsupported assertions about the associations' selectivity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=14673 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters from coaches do not constitute comparable evidence because comparable evidence is unavailable where the standard criteria apply. Coaching students is not the same as formally judging, and there is no documentary evidence (judging slips, event programs, judge credentials) of the petitioner's participation as a judge.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The letters from coaches do not constitute comparable evidence because comparable evidence is unavailable where the standard criteria apply. Coaching students is not the same as formally judging, and there is no documentary evidence (judging slips, event programs, judge credentials) of the petitioner's participation as a judge.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Awards earned as a competitor cannot be considered because the petitioner's field is coaching. Awards won by the petitioner's students do not satisfy the plain language requirement that the petitioner received qualifying awards. The record contains no evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in coaching.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Awards earned as a competitor cannot be considered because the petitioner's field is coaching. Awards won by the petitioner's students do not satisfy the plain language requirement that the petitioner received qualifying awards. The record contains no evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in coaching.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record shows the petitioner performs a leading or critical role for his current employer, but there is no documentary evidence that the current employer has a distinguished reputation. No letters from former employers were provided, so prior roles cannot be assessed. Additionally, the plural language of the regulation requires evidence of a critical role for more than one distinguished organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the petitioner performs a leading or critical role for his current employer, but there is no documentary evidence that the current employer has a distinguished reputation. No letters from former employers were provided, so prior roles cannot be assessed. Additionally, the plural language of the regulation requires evidence of a critical role for more than one distinguished organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14683 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's membership on the Soviet National Fencing Team relates to his career as a competitor, not as a coach. Additionally, the regulation's plural language requires membership in more than one qualifying association, and no waiver of that requirement exists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's membership on the Soviet National Fencing Team relates to his career as a competitor, not as a coach. Additionally, the regulation's plural language requires membership in more than one qualifying association, and no waiver of that requirement exists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c