Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22951–22960

EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The only coaching-related article submitted (July 3, 2009, The Courier of Montgomery County) is primarily about the petitioner's student, not the petitioner, and there is no evidence the publication qualifies as major media. A second potentially qualifying article lacked a complete translation and could not be considered.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The only coaching-related article submitted (July 3, 2009, The Courier of Montgomery County) is primarily about the petitioner's student, not the petitioner, and there is no evidence the publication qualifies as major media. A second potentially qualifying article lacked a complete translation and could not be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14680
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

U.S. employer intending and desiring to employ the beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this issue sua sponte via NOID after discovering the petitioner had been voluntarily dissolved before filing. No documentary evidence of successor-in-interest was provided, and section 204(j) is irrelevant to whether the named petitioner is valid.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte via NOID after discovering the petitioner had been voluntarily dissolved before filing. No documentary evidence of successor-in-interest was provided, and section 204(j) is irrelevant to whether the named petitioner is valid.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_10_B5203; source_row=14692
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay, but corrects the Director by noting the 2010 tax returns were filed by a different entity and do not show the petitioner's ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay, but corrects the Director by noting the 2010 tax returns were filed by a different entity and do not show the petitioner's ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_10_B5203; source_row=14693
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AACRAO EDGE, a peer-reviewed resource, indicates that an Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and an Indian M.S. is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree — not a U.S. master's degree. The private evaluations lacked credit-hour analysis and peer-review support and were therefore given less weight.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AACRAO EDGE, a peer-reviewed resource, indicates that an Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and an Indian M.S. is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree — not a U.S. master's degree. The private evaluations lacked credit-hour analysis and peer-review support and were therefore given less weight. The labor certification required a master's degree with no alternative combination permitted, and USCIS must apply requirements as written.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_09_B5203; source_row=14691
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the evidence lacked information on participants or selection criteria, that one claimed bronze medal was contradicted by independent online research showing different winners, and that fraudulent and inconsistent newspaper translations further undermined credibility.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence lacked information on participants or selection criteria, that one claimed bronze medal was contradicted by independent online research showing different winners, and that fraudulent and inconsistent newspaper translations further undermined credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=14672
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

labor certification requires advanced degree professional

Why AAO was not persuaded

The ETA Form 9089 specifies a minimum requirement of a bachelor's degree (obtainable through any combination of education, training, or experience) plus 60 months of experience, or a bachelor's degree with zero years of experience.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The ETA Form 9089 specifies a minimum requirement of a bachelor's degree (obtainable through any combination of education, training, or experience) plus 60 months of experience, or a bachelor's degree with zero years of experience. Because the labor certification allows a beneficiary to qualify without a bachelor's degree at all, or with a bachelor's and no experience, it does not require an advanced degree professional as mandated for EB-2 classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_04_B5203; source_row=14687
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary's qualifications per ETA Form 9089

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO independently confirmed the beneficiary held the required Optometry doctorate and Vermont licensure as of the priority date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO independently confirmed the beneficiary held the required Optometry doctorate and Vermont licensure as of the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=14686
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

On de novo review of the new and existing evidence, AAO found the petitioner could pay the full proffered wage in 2010 and 2011.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
On de novo review of the new and existing evidence, AAO found the petitioner could pay the full proffered wage in 2010 and 2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=14685
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

While agreeing that letters alone are insufficient, the AAO found the director erred because the record also contained evidence of awards, competitive results, and rankings of fencers the petitioner coached, which together are sufficient to demonstrate original contributions of major significance as a coach.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
While agreeing that letters alone are insufficient, the AAO found the director erred because the record also contained evidence of awards, competitive results, and rankings of fencers the petitioner coached, which together are sufficient to demonstrate original contributions of major significance as a coach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=14682
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay the proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2009 net income of $41,399 and net current assets of $21,591 both fell below the proffered wage of $61,984, and the petitioner failed to provide 2010 tax returns. Unaudited financial statements, bank statements, and general assertions about the economic slowdown did not cure the deficiency. Multiple simultaneous petitions further undermined the petitioner's ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2009 net income of $41,399 and net current assets of $21,591 both fell below the proffered wage of $61,984, and the petitioner failed to provide 2010 tax returns. Unaudited financial statements, bank statements, and general assertions about the economic slowdown did not cure the deficiency. Multiple simultaneous petitions further undermined the petitioner's ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=14676
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment