Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
five years of progressive experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary holds a foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, but the single experience letter from her prior employer failed to specifically describe her job duties in a manner sufficient to establish that they were progressive in nature, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary holds a foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, but the single experience letter from her prior employer failed to specifically describe her job duties in a manner sufficient to establish that they were progressive in nature, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=14677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
summary dismissal for failure to specifically identify error
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the appeal met the standard for summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) because the petitioner identified no specific error in the Director's decision and submitted no supporting brief or evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the appeal met the standard for summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) because the petitioner identified no specific error in the Director's decision and submitted no supporting brief or evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-18_05_B5203; source_row=14688 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because although the beneficiary did perform a leading or critical role for the petitioner (which has a distinguished reputation), the regulation requires evidence of such roles for more than one organization or establishment with a distinguished reputation, and the petitioner failed to make that showing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because although the beneficiary did perform a leading or critical role for the petitioner (which has a distinguished reputation), the regulation requires evidence of such roles for more than one organization or establishment with a distinguished reputation, and the petitioner failed to make that showing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=14642 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed the criterion was not met, finding that: the submitted salary data did not provide total remuneration information; DOL prevailing wage data alone does not establish 'significantly' higher pay; and the comparison to Emergency Management Specialists was inappropriate because their duties differed materially from the beneficiary's duties directing international provider relations for a medical assistance company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the criterion was not met, finding that: the submitted salary data did not provide total remuneration information; DOL prevailing wage data alone does not establish 'significantly' higher pay; and the comparison to Emergency Management Specialists was inappropriate because their duties differed materially from the beneficiary's duties directing international provider relations for a medical assistance company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=14643 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because although the beneficiary's contribution to the MEDEX 360m product qualifies as an original business-related contribution of major significance, the regulation's plural 'contributions' requires more than one, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate multiple qualifying contributions.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because although the beneficiary's contribution to the MEDEX 360m product qualifies as an original business-related contribution of major significance, the regulation's plural 'contributions' requires more than one, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate multiple qualifying contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=14641 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Grammy nomination lacked primary evidence, and even if proven, counsel did not show how a nomination impacted the field. The chart evidence showed Juanes' original version hit #1 before the remix contract was even signed. Recommendation letters praised the petitioner generally but did not specifically identify contributions of major significance to the broader field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Grammy nomination lacked primary evidence, and even if proven, counsel did not show how a nomination impacted the field. The chart evidence showed Juanes' original version hit #1 before the remix contract was even signed. Recommendation letters praised the petitioner generally but did not specifically identify contributions of major significance to the broader field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_04_B2203; source_row=14663 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
A disc jockey performing before an audience is performing, not displaying work in the sense of a painter or sculptor at a gallery. This criterion is limited to the visual arts, which has been upheld by federal courts. Accepting DJ performances would render this criterion meaningless.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
A disc jockey performing before an audience is performing, not displaying work in the sense of a painter or sculptor at a gallery. This criterion is limited to the visual arts, which has been upheld by federal courts. Accepting DJ performances would render this criterion meaningless.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_04_B2203; source_row=14664 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material in professional or major trade publications or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The d-mode article merely listed the petitioner among 16 DJs in a survey without discussion of his work, lacked title and author, and had incomplete translation. The residentadvisor.net material was an interview recording answers rather than published material about the petitioner, and no independent objective evidence was submitted to show it qualifies as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The d-mode article merely listed the petitioner among 16 DJs in a survey without discussion of his work, lacked title and author, and had incomplete translation. The residentadvisor.net material was an interview recording answers rather than published material about the petitioner, and no independent objective evidence was submitted to show it qualifies as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_04_B2203; source_row=14662 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Latin Grammy nomination was supported only by an untranslated self-asserting email, not primary evidence, and even a proven Grammy nomination is not the same as winning. A collaboration/remix contract does not constitute an award. Neither rises to the level of a major, internationally recognized award as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Latin Grammy nomination was supported only by an untranslated self-asserting email, not primary evidence, and even a proven Grammy nomination is not the same as winning. A collaboration/remix contract does not constitute an award. Neither rises to the level of a major, internationally recognized award as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_04_B2203; source_row=14661 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commercial successes in the performing arts shown by box office receipts or record/CD/video sales
Why AAO was not persuaded
The regulation requires evidence of commercial success in the specific form of box office receipts or sales. The petitioner submitted no documentary evidence of box office receipts or actual disk sales, only performance venue evidence and chart listings, which is insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The regulation requires evidence of commercial success in the specific form of box office receipts or sales. The petitioner submitted no documentary evidence of box office receipts or actual disk sales, only performance venue evidence and chart listings, which is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-15_04_B2203; source_row=14667 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c