Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23041–23050

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

meets labor certification educational requirement

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent. Since the Diplome d'Ingenieur is equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated educational requirement for the proffered position.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent. Since the Diplome d'Ingenieur is equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated educational requirement for the proffered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_02_B5203; source_row=14568
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Line of credit as evidence of ability to pay

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding a line of credit, which is merely an unenforceable commitment to loan rather than existing funds, and comparable to a credit card limit rather than cash.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding a line of credit, which is merely an unenforceable commitment to loan rather than existing funds, and comparable to a credit card limit rather than cash.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14573
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's net income on Line 28 of Form 1120 was $29,473 in 2006 and $0 in 2007, both below the proffered wage of $74,797.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's net income on Line 28 of Form 1120 was $29,473 in 2006 and $0 in 2007, both below the proffered wage of $74,797.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of business circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the petitioner has been in business since 2001, it did not demonstrate a pattern of significant growth, an uncharacteristic business loss, a sound industry reputation, or milestone achievements comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner, and simultaneous pending petitions further undermined a realistic-job-offer finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the petitioner has been in business since 2001, it did not demonstrate a pattern of significant growth, an uncharacteristic business loss, a sound industry reputation, or milestone achievements comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner, and simultaneous pending petitions further undermined a realistic-job-offer finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14574
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Net current assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

Net current assets were $56,648 in 2006 (below the proffered wage) and $374,326 in 2007, but the 2007 figure was diminished by the petitioner's multiple simultaneously pending I-140 and I-129 petitions, which required it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries' wages.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Net current assets were $56,648 in 2006 (below the proffered wage) and $374,326 in 2007, but the 2007 figure was diminished by the petitioner's multiple simultaneously pending I-140 and I-129 petitions, which required it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries' wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification job requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary lacks the required bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, and the record shows only about 8 years of laboratory management experience rather than the 10 years required, with some foreign experience not described as managerial. The petitioner's request to reclassify as EB-3 on appeal was rejected as an impermissible material change to the petition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary lacks the required bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, and the record shows only about 8 years of laboratory management experience rather than the 10 years required, with some foreign experience not described as managerial. The petitioner's request to reclassify as EB-3 on appeal was rejected as an impermissible material change to the petition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_01_B5203; source_row=14566
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AACRAO EDGE indicates the beneficiary's Indian three-year BA is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and the Indian MA is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The submitted evaluations conflict with EDGE, lack explanation of credit-hour calculations, and are not peer-reviewed.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AACRAO EDGE indicates the beneficiary's Indian three-year BA is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and the Indian MA is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The submitted evaluations conflict with EDGE, lack explanation of credit-hour calculations, and are not peer-reviewed. Because the beneficiary does not have a full four-year foreign equivalent baccalaureate, her Indian MA cannot be treated as equivalent to a U.S. master's degree, and she therefore does not meet the labor certification's minimum education requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_06_B5203; source_row=14575
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets minimum education stated on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

Because Part H-8 disallowed alternate combinations and the beneficiary's foreign education is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's, the beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's master's-degree requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because Part H-8 disallowed alternate combinations and the beneficiary's foreign education is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's, the beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's master's-degree requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_04_B5203; source_row=14570
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay the proffered wage

What the decision said

AAO does not reach the ultimate ability-to-pay question; it withdraws the denial because the director relied on evidence predating the priority date and remands for development of post-priority-date evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach the ultimate ability-to-pay question; it withdraws the denial because the director relied on evidence predating the priority date and remands for development of post-priority-date evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-05_01_B5203; source_row=14563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

What the decision said

AAO did not reach a substantive ability-to-pay conclusion; it withdrew the denial and remanded for development of compliant evidence (tax returns, audited financial statements, or annual reports for 2009-2011).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a substantive ability-to-pay conclusion; it withdrew the denial and remanded for development of compliant evidence (tax returns, audited financial statements, or annual reports for 2009-2011).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-05_02_B5203; source_row=14564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment