Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23081–23090

NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the prospective employment under the Associate Physician Agreement was patient care only with no research component, and found ABP certification and AAP fellowship are basic credentials held by tens of thousands of pediatricians rather than national distinctions.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the prospective employment under the Associate Physician Agreement was patient care only with no research component, and found ABP certification and AAP fellowship are basic credentials held by tens of thousands of pediatricians rather than national distinctions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_04_B5203; source_row=14540
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

benefit to the national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the witness letters were largely conclusory, repetitive in wording across multiple authors, and unsupported by independent documentary evidence of impact, and that predictions about unfinished projects cannot satisfy the petitioner's burden; the director's failure to credit the petitioner's published abstracts was an error that did not change the outcome.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the witness letters were largely conclusory, repetitive in wording across multiple authors, and unsupported by independent documentary evidence of impact, and that predictions about unfinished projects cannot satisfy the petitioner's burden; the director's failure to credit the petitioner's published abstracts was an error that did not change the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_04_B5203; source_row=14541
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not dispute that medicine and pediatric research are areas of substantial intrinsic merit; the analysis turned on the other NYSDOT factors.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not dispute that medicine and pediatric research are areas of substantial intrinsic merit; the analysis turned on the other NYSDOT factors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_04_B5203; source_row=14539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner failed to respond to the AAO's RFE requesting tax returns, audited financial statements, and related documents for 2008–2011, resulting in dismissal of the appeal as abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to respond to the AAO's RFE requesting tax returns, audited financial statements, and related documents for 2008–2011, resulting in dismissal of the appeal as abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-29_02_B5203; source_row=14526
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Job offer requires professional holding an advanced degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS must read the labor certification exactly as completed by the employer. The alternate education section of the ETA Form 9089 specifies 'Other,' defined as any suitable combination of education, training, or experience, allowing someone without a degree to qualify, so the job does not require an advanced degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS must read the labor certification exactly as completed by the employer. The alternate education section of the ETA Form 9089 specifies 'Other,' defined as any suitable combination of education, training, or experience, allowing someone without a degree to qualify, so the job does not require an advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-29_01_B5203; source_row=14525
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found counsel failed to explain how the petitioner's past experiences distinguish her from other qualified math teachers. The denied labor certification application did not demonstrate prospective national interest, and the petitioner lacked a demonstrated history of achievement with influence on the field as a whole.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found counsel failed to explain how the petitioner's past experiences distinguish her from other qualified math teachers. The denied labor certification application did not demonstrate prospective national interest, and the petitioner lacked a demonstrated history of achievement with influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-25_01_B5203; source_row=14524
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found no evidence that the petitioner's math game or website had national distribution or impact. Plans for future national reach were speculative and not established at the time of filing. Post-filing actions like the patent application could not retroactively show eligibility.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found no evidence that the petitioner's math game or website had national distribution or impact. Plans for future national reach were speculative and not established at the time of filing. Post-filing actions like the patent application could not retroactively show eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-25_01_B5203; source_row=14523
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that unsupported counsel assertions do not constitute evidence, and that the petitioner's claimed achievements as a math teacher and game developer lacked evidentiary support. Even demonstrated exceptional ability in one's field does not guarantee eligibility for the NIW.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that unsupported counsel assertions do not constitute evidence, and that the petitioner's claimed achievements as a math teacher and game developer lacked evidentiary support. Even demonstrated exceptional ability in one's field does not guarantee eligibility for the NIW.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-25_01_B5203; source_row=14522
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner demonstrated only one nationally recognized award (USTFCCCA); the plain language of the regulation requires more than one prize or award. Counsel failed to submit any documentation of purported awards from CSO and CFF. Athletes' awards cannot substitute for the petitioner's own receipt of awards under this criterion.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner demonstrated only one nationally recognized award (USTFCCCA); the plain language of the regulation requires more than one prize or award. Counsel failed to submit any documentation of purported awards from CSO and CFF. Athletes' awards cannot substitute for the petitioner's own receipt of awards under this criterion. Comparable evidence under § 204.5(h)(4) was inapplicable because the criterion clearly applies to this occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-24_02_B2203; source_row=14510
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the petitioner's training techniques showed originality, the letters were vague, solicited, and did not demonstrate widespread or major impact on the field as a whole. Athletes' success at regional/conference levels and general praise from supporters did not establish contributions of major significance. One letter noted adoption of the single-leg training protocol but named no specific other programs or coaches.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
While the petitioner's training techniques showed originality, the letters were vague, solicited, and did not demonstrate widespread or major impact on the field as a whole. Athletes' success at regional/conference levels and general praise from supporters did not establish contributions of major significance. One letter noted adoption of the single-leg training protocol but named no specific other programs or coaches.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-24_02_B2203; source_row=14511
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment