Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23171–23180

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

Original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that none of the evidence identifies what specifically the petitioner contributed as an individual, as opposed to the creative team as a whole, and no evidence establishes that anything the petitioner did was original. Further, even if one contribution were found, the regulation requires contributions in the plural.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that none of the evidence identifies what specifically the petitioner contributed as an individual, as opposed to the creative team as a whole, and no evidence establishes that anything the petitioner did was original. Further, even if one contribution were found, the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_06_B2203; source_row=14433
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or U.S. baccalaureate (or foreign equivalent) plus five years progressive experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the director: a three-year foreign degree is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree under Matter of Shah and EDGE, and NBCOT's licensure standards are not the standards for advanced degree professional classification under section 203(b)(2).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director: a three-year foreign degree is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree under Matter of Shah and EDGE, and NBCOT's licensure standards are not the standards for advanced degree professional classification under section 203(b)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_08_B5203; source_row=14440
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's net income was deeply negative in 2007 (-$14,874,000) and 2008 (-$4,821,000), and its net current assets were also negative in both years. The petitioner paid the beneficiary well below the proffered wage in 2008 and nothing in 2007. None of the petitioner's alternative arguments (Yates Memorandum, bank statements, lines of credit, CFO letter, wages to other employees) were sufficient.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's net income was deeply negative in 2007 (-$14,874,000) and 2008 (-$4,821,000), and its net current assets were also negative in both years. The petitioner paid the beneficiary well below the proffered wage in 2008 and nothing in 2007. None of the petitioner's alternative arguments (Yates Memorandum, bank statements, lines of credit, CFO letter, wages to other employees) were sufficient. The Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis also did not save the petition because no uncharacteristic loss or outstanding business reputation was shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B5203; source_row=14428
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Bachelor's degree in business administration or related field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO identified this as an additional ground of ineligibility not raised by the director. The beneficiary holds a degree in economics, which is a social science housed in a college of arts and sciences, whereas business administration is in a school of commerce/business. While there is some overlap, the record contained no evidence that economics is 'related' to business administration for purposes of the labor certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO identified this as an additional ground of ineligibility not raised by the director. The beneficiary holds a degree in economics, which is a social science housed in a college of arts and sciences, whereas business administration is in a school of commerce/business. While there is some overlap, the record contained no evidence that economics is 'related' to business administration for purposes of the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B5203; source_row=14430
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

60 months of progressive post-baccalaureate experience

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the affidavit submitted on appeal sufficiently documented the beneficiary's 60 months of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, disagreeing with the director on this sub-issue.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the affidavit submitted on appeal sufficiently documented the beneficiary's 60 months of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, disagreeing with the director on this sub-issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B5203; source_row=14429
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the wages paid did not match the proffered wage, the predecessor's net income was negative each year, and net current assets were insufficient. Assets of related entities or the sole shareholder cannot be considered.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the wages paid did not match the proffered wage, the predecessor's net income was negative each year, and net current assets were insufficient. Assets of related entities or the sole shareholder cannot be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_07_B5203; source_row=14439
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prize or award

What the decision said

Not claimed by the petitioner and not discussed in the decision.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Not claimed by the petitioner and not discussed in the decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B2203; source_row=14419
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements of criterion iii.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements of criterion iii.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B2203; source_row=14421
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements of criterion iv.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements of criterion iv.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_05_B2203; source_row=14422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

other

Job offer requires advanced degree or equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

The ETA Form 9089 lists only a bachelor's degree and three years of experience as minimum requirements, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4). The petitioner cannot make material post-filing changes to correct the deficiency, and USCIS cannot ignore the terms of the labor certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The ETA Form 9089 lists only a bachelor's degree and three years of experience as minimum requirements, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4). The petitioner cannot make material post-filing changes to correct the deficiency, and USCIS cannot ignore the terms of the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-14_02_B5203; source_row=14409
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment