Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23271–23280

EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The comparison employee was a temporary worker whose position was not shown to be equivalent. The online printout (a Google search result) did not establish average salary for the petitioner's teaching position. Additionally, the petitioner's salary as an educator does not reflect his remuneration in biotechnology research, which is the basis of the petition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The comparison employee was a temporary worker whose position was not shown to be equivalent. The online printout (a Google search result) did not establish average salary for the petitioner's teaching position. Additionally, the petitioner's salary as an educator does not reflect his remuneration in biotechnology research, which is the basis of the petition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=14303
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

The plain language of this criterion is limited to the visual arts, and scientific presentations at biotechnology conferences do not constitute artistic exhibitions or showcases. The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions. Conference proceedings were better considered under criterion (vi).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The plain language of this criterion is limited to the visual arts, and scientific presentations at biotechnology conferences do not constitute artistic exhibitions or showcases. The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions. Conference proceedings were better considered under criterion (vi).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=14301
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The PSA bylaws show membership is open to anyone interested in phycology who pays dues, with no outstanding achievement requirement. The AMI Rules require only a degree in microbiology or allied disciplines and a recommendation from one life member; academic standing is not an outstanding achievement, and there is insufficient evidence that the petitioner's standing was judged by recognized national or international experts.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The PSA bylaws show membership is open to anyone interested in phycology who pays dues, with no outstanding achievement requirement. The AMI Rules require only a degree in microbiology or allied disciplines and a recommendation from one life member; academic standing is not an outstanding achievement, and there is insufficient evidence that the petitioner's standing was judged by recognized national or international experts. Additionally, the regulation requires membership in more than one qualifying association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=14298
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The reference letters are largely speculative, predicting potential future impact rather than establishing that existing work constitutes original contributions of major significance. The additional evidence (citations, a book chapter helpful to students, a thesis reference, and conference presentations) does not show the petitioner's research is widely influential as required for major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The reference letters are largely speculative, predicting potential future impact rather than establishing that existing work constitutes original contributions of major significance. The additional evidence (citations, a book chapter helpful to students, a thesis reference, and conference presentations) does not show the petitioner's research is widely influential as required for major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=14299
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The submitted letter did not establish that the work of an individual Montessori teacher is national in scope. NYSDOT itself stated that the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school would not be in the national interest for waiver purposes.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The submitted letter did not establish that the work of an individual Montessori teacher is national in scope. NYSDOT itself stated that the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school would not be in the national interest for waiver purposes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_02_B5203; source_row=14315
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not dispute that education has intrinsic merit, noting 'the intrinsic merit of education is not in dispute.'

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not dispute that education has intrinsic merit, noting 'the intrinsic merit of education is not in dispute.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_02_B5203; source_row=14314
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner authored articles published in the Indian Journal of Experimental Biology and accepted in the Indian Journal of Microbiology, which the AAO found to be professional publications, satisfying this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner authored articles published in the Indian Journal of Experimental Biology and accepted in the Indian Journal of Microbiology, which the AAO found to be professional publications, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B2203; source_row=14300
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary possesses educational credentials required by labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the beneficiary's Bachelor's degree in Economics satisfies the labor certification requirement of a degree in a related major, based on job advertisements demonstrating the petitioner's intent to accept a wide range of majors, which also put similarly qualified U.S. workers on notice of eligibility.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the beneficiary's Bachelor's degree in Economics satisfies the labor certification requirement of a degree in a related major, based on job advertisements demonstrating the petitioner's intent to accept a wide range of majors, which also put similarly qualified U.S. workers on notice of eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=14305
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest served to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The witness letters described job duties and qualifications but did not provide objective evidence comparing the petitioner to other qualified professionals. The record lacked corroboration for claims of superiority, evidence of meaningful implementation of findings, or any objective measure distinguishing the petitioner from others in his specialized field.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The witness letters described job duties and qualifications but did not provide objective evidence comparing the petitioner to other qualified professionals. The record lacked corroboration for claims of superiority, evidence of meaningful implementation of findings, or any objective measure distinguishing the petitioner from others in his specialized field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_03_B5203; source_row=14327
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the director and AAO agreed that testing pesticides for hazards and disseminating findings has substantial intrinsic merit. This was not in dispute.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
Both the director and AAO agreed that testing pesticides for hazards and disseminating findings has substantial intrinsic merit. This was not in dispute.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_03_B5203; source_row=14325
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment