Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23281–23290

NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

The dissemination of the PISP findings gives the work national scope; this was not contested.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The dissemination of the PISP findings gives the work national scope; this was not contested.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_03_B5203; source_row=14326
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Intent to continue work in area of expertise (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner had not shown intent to continue working as a field hockey player or coach. She had not competed as an athlete since the early 1990s, admitted to working as a seamstress after arriving in 1999, provided inconsistent statements about when she began coaching, and any coaching was minimal and incidental to her main source of income.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner had not shown intent to continue working as a field hockey player or coach. She had not competed as an athlete since the early 1990s, admitted to working as a seamstress after arriving in 1999, provided inconsistent statements about when she began coaching, and any coaching was minimal and incidental to her main source of income.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-01_02_B2203; source_row=14306
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

foreign degree equivalency to U.S. master's degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO relied on EDGE to confirm the beneficiary's foreign credentials, individually or combined, are not equivalent to a U.S. MBA or any alternative listed field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO relied on EDGE to confirm the beneficiary's foreign credentials, individually or combined, are not equivalent to a U.S. MBA or any alternative listed field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-30_02_B5203; source_row=14297
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AComparable evidenceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

Comparable evidence

Comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The comparable evidence provision only applies when the ten regulatory criteria do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation. The petitioner failed to show this prerequisite was met, and the submitted materials did not mention the beneficiary's specific achievements. The petitioner also failed to explain how the submitted documentation was comparable to any specific objective evidence required by the regulations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The comparable evidence provision only applies when the ten regulatory criteria do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation. The petitioner failed to show this prerequisite was met, and the submitted materials did not mention the beneficiary's specific achievements. The petitioner also failed to explain how the submitted documentation was comparable to any specific objective evidence required by the regulations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_01_B2203; source_row=14286
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

Meeting at least three evidentiary criteria (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner on appeal abandoned any challenge to the director's finding on the ten criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's conclusion that the petitioner failed to demonstrate the beneficiary satisfies the antecedent regulatory requirement of three types of evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner on appeal abandoned any challenge to the director's finding on the ten criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's conclusion that the petitioner failed to demonstrate the beneficiary satisfies the antecedent regulatory requirement of three types of evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_01_B2203; source_row=14285
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AACRAO EDGE establishes that an Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and that an Indian M.S. following such a degree is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The private evaluations were discounted as not in accord with EDGE's peer-reviewed equivalencies.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AACRAO EDGE establishes that an Indian three-year B.S. is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and that an Indian M.S. following such a degree is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The private evaluations were discounted as not in accord with EDGE's peer-reviewed equivalencies. The labor certification required a master's degree and did not permit an alternate combination of education and experience, so the beneficiary failed to meet the minimum education requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=14288
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement of labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification required a doctorate or foreign equivalent with no alternate combination accepted. The credential evaluation opining equivalency to a D.V.M. was treated as advisory only and given less weight as not sufficiently corroborated. A single foreign equivalent degree at the required level is mandatory and combinations of lesser degrees do not suffice.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification required a doctorate or foreign equivalent with no alternate combination accepted. The credential evaluation opining equivalency to a D.V.M. was treated as advisory only and given less weight as not sufficiently corroborated. A single foreign equivalent degree at the required level is mandatory and combinations of lesser degrees do not suffice.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_03_B5203; source_row=14290
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

Wages paid by a legally separate corporation cannot be attributed to the petitioner. No tax returns or audited financial statements were submitted despite being specifically requested. The Sonegawa totality factors did not support ability to pay given the absence of evidence of growth, outstanding reputation, or other indicators.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Wages paid by a legally separate corporation cannot be attributed to the petitioner. No tax returns or audited financial statements were submitted despite being specifically requested. The Sonegawa totality factors did not support ability to pay given the absence of evidence of growth, outstanding reputation, or other indicators.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_03_B5203; source_row=14291
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

benefit to national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner failed to show individual influence in his field. Witness letters made exaggerated claims unsupported by objective documentary evidence; the petitioner had not yet completed medical training; citation history was minimal and not shown to exceed the norm in his specialty.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner failed to show individual influence in his field. Witness letters made exaggerated claims unsupported by objective documentary evidence; the petitioner had not yet completed medical training; citation history was minimal and not shown to exceed the norm in his specialty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_05_B5203; source_row=14296
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The director acknowledged the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation as a physician practicing internal medicine, and the AAO did not disturb that finding.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The director acknowledged the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation as a physician practicing internal medicine, and the AAO did not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-27_05_B5203; source_row=14294
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment