Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not pursue it in the RFE response and did not raise it on appeal. The AAO concluded the issue was abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not pursue it in the RFE response and did not raise it on appeal. The AAO concluded the issue was abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_09_B2203; source_row=14188 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner documented authorship of scholarly articles in reputable scientific journals, satisfying the plain language requirements of this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner documented authorship of scholarly articles in reputable scientific journals, satisfying the plain language requirements of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_08_B2203; source_row=14185 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner peer-reviewed manuscripts for numerous reputable journals and served on doctoral committees, satisfying the plain language requirements of this criterion. The NSF Peer Review Panel service post-dated the filing date and was disregarded.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner peer-reviewed manuscripts for numerous reputable journals and served on doctoral committees, satisfying the plain language requirements of this criterion. The NSF Peer Review Panel service post-dated the filing date and was disregarded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_08_B2203; source_row=14183 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
National in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner relied on general evidence of acupuncture's effectiveness but did not establish that the clinical practice of one acupuncturist has national scope. Evidence that acupuncture is used nationally does not show that a single practitioner's work reaches a national scale.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner relied on general evidence of acupuncture's effectiveness but did not establish that the clinical practice of one acupuncturist has national scope. Evidence that acupuncture is used nationally does not show that a single practitioner's work reaches a national scale.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_02_B5203; source_row=14174 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that counsel's assertions, supported by evidence in the record, were persuasive that the beneficiary's occupation in nuclear engineering has substantial intrinsic merit, and withdrew the director's contrary finding.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that counsel's assertions, supported by evidence in the record, were persuasive that the beneficiary's occupation in nuclear engineering has substantial intrinsic merit, and withdrew the director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_01_B5203; source_row=14167 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that witness letters gave context to the significance of the beneficiary's specific achievements — such as reducing fretting wear and improving heat transfer — distinguishing him from other qualified professionals by the scale and significance of his contributions.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that witness letters gave context to the significance of the beneficiary's specific achievements — such as reducing fretting wear and improving heat transfer — distinguishing him from other qualified professionals by the scale and significance of his contributions. Given the proprietary nature of the work, widespread citation was not expected, and the witness testimony credibly established the beneficiary's past achievements stand out in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_01_B5203; source_row=14169 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that he minimally meets the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ix).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that he minimally meets the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ix).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-19_03_B2203; source_row=14179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c