Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Letters from studios were conclusory and failed to explain how the petitioner performed in a leading or critical role; there was no evidence differentiating her role from other instructors; and sporadic participation in one instructional DVD did not constitute a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole. Neither studio nor organization was shown to have a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Letters from studios were conclusory and failed to explain how the petitioner performed in a leading or critical role; there was no evidence differentiating her role from other instructors; and sporadic participation in one instructional DVD did not constitute a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole. Neither studio nor organization was shown to have a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_04_B2203; source_row=14142 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted materials failed on multiple grounds: uncertified/summary translations, missing title/date/author, material not primarily about the petitioner, the publications not shown to be professional or major media, and several items related to the petitioner as a performer rather than as an instructor or choreographer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted materials failed on multiple grounds: uncertified/summary translations, missing title/date/author, material not primarily about the petitioner, the publications not shown to be professional or major media, and several items related to the petitioner as a performer rather than as an instructor or choreographer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_04_B2203; source_row=14137 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the regulation requires the alien's own prizes or awards, not those of her students; moreover, competition-derived prizes were outside the petitioner's field of endeavor as an instructor/choreographer; and the petitioner failed to submit primary documentary evidence of any such prizes.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the regulation requires the alien's own prizes or awards, not those of her students; moreover, competition-derived prizes were outside the petitioner's field of endeavor as an instructor/choreographer; and the petitioner failed to submit primary documentary evidence of any such prizes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_04_B2203; source_row=14135 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that letters from studio employers and participation in an instructional DVD failed to demonstrate a leading or critical role at organizations with a distinguished reputation.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that letters from studio employers and participation in an instructional DVD failed to demonstrate a leading or critical role at organizations with a distinguished reputation. Letters were conclusory without explaining why the petitioner's role was leading or critical, no evidence differentiated her role from other instructors, and no evidence established that any of the organizations had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=14133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that submitted materials—including foreign-language articles with uncertified translations, a news release about the NCLR ALMA Awards, and a magazine article about a show—failed to constitute published material about the petitioner as a dance coach or choreographer in professional or major trade publications or other major media.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that submitted materials—including foreign-language articles with uncertified translations, a news release about the NCLR ALMA Awards, and a magazine article about a show—failed to constitute published material about the petitioner as a dance coach or choreographer in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Materials referred to her as a performer, not an instructor/choreographer, and several lacked required title, date, and author information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=14131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating participation as a judge for a competition from 2000–2002, minimally satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating participation as a judge for a competition from 2000–2002, minimally satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_04_B2203; source_row=14138 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=14134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that she participated as a judge for the 'Seasons of the Year' tournament from 2000–2002, minimally satisfying the plain language of the regulation. The AAO withdrew the director's finding on this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that she participated as a judge for the 'Seasons of the Year' tournament from 2000–2002, minimally satisfying the plain language of the regulation. The AAO withdrew the director's finding on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=14132 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO's analysis of this criterion is truncated in the decision text; the director had found it met but the AAO's specific conclusion on this criterion is not fully rendered in the available text. The AAO's overall conclusion that fewer than three criteria were met implies this criterion was ultimately not credited.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO's analysis of this criterion is truncated in the decision text; the director had found it met but the AAO's specific conclusion on this criterion is not fully rendered in the available text. The AAO's overall conclusion that fewer than three criteria were met implies this criterion was ultimately not credited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-05_01_B2203; source_row=14130 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c