Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Actual compensation to the beneficiary only covered September 2008 through May 2009, a fraction of the required period from the December 7, 2007 priority date to the present. The petitioner also failed to submit adequate tax return evidence for the full period.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Actual compensation to the beneficiary only covered September 2008 through May 2009, a fraction of the required period from the December 7, 2007 priority date to the present. The petitioner also failed to submit adequate tax return evidence for the full period.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-03_05_B5203; source_row=14108 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the petitioner that the national-scope prong applies to the occupation rather than the individual alien, and that a leadership position in a consumer electronics company can have national scope. AAO withdrew the director's adverse finding on this prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the petitioner that the national-scope prong applies to the occupation rather than the individual alien, and that a leadership position in a consumer electronics company can have national scope. AAO withdrew the director's adverse finding on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-03_01_B5203; source_row=14105 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner provided only vague claims and self-serving assertions about doubling or tripling sales without comparative data, no documentation of his impact on the field, and no track record as a top business executive that would support projections of future benefit as president of a consumer electronics company.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner provided only vague claims and self-serving assertions about doubling or tripling sales without comparative data, no documentation of his impact on the field, and no track record as a top business executive that would support projections of future benefit as president of a consumer electronics company. AAO also noted the petitioner is already the beneficiary of an approved labor-certification-based I-140 with an earlier priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-03_01_B5203; source_row=14106 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other15 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted articles either lack required elements (author, publication name, date), are not about the petitioner (often about his brother or other fencers), lack circulation evidence showing major media, are uncertified foreign-language pieces, or relate to his competitive career rather than coaching. A press release does not qualify as published material under the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles either lack required elements (author, publication name, date), are not about the petitioner (often about his brother or other fencers), lack circulation evidence showing major media, are uncertified foreign-language pieces, or relate to his competitive career rather than coaching. A press release does not qualify as published material under the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=14081 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner submitted only letters attesting to his fencing-competition awards from the 1990s rather than primary evidence, and those competitive awards do not relate to coaching, the field for which classification is sought. Awards won by his students do not constitute the petitioner's own receipt of awards.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted only letters attesting to his fencing-competition awards from the 1990s rather than primary evidence, and those competitive awards do not relate to coaching, the field for which classification is sought. Awards won by his students do not constitute the petitioner's own receipt of awards. Evidence in the record shows national coaching awards do exist (contradicting counsel's claim), but the petitioner has not received any.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=14080 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other15 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's reliance on Economic Research Institute mean-salary data for 'Fitness Trainers and Aerobics Instructors' in three localities is improper because the criterion requires high (not above-average) earnings, the geographic limitation is too narrow, and the comparison occupation is not equivalent to fencing coach. A post-filing letter of agreement is not considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's reliance on Economic Research Institute mean-salary data for 'Fitness Trainers and Aerobics Instructors' in three localities is improper because the criterion requires high (not above-average) earnings, the geographic limitation is too narrow, and the comparison occupation is not equivalent to fencing coach. A post-filing letter of agreement is not considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=14084 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted no evidence—in any form—showing that his contributions have exceeded or will continue to exceed those of others in his specialty to a degree warranting a national interest waiver.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted no evidence—in any form—showing that his contributions have exceeded or will continue to exceed those of others in his specialty to a degree warranting a national interest waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_04_B5203; source_row=14097 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Foreign degree equivalent to U.S. master's degree or advanced degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO preferred the peer-reviewed AACRAO EDGE information over the private credential evaluation, finding that the Inzinier degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The evaluator's opinion was based solely on program length, not content, and failed to compare the Inzinier program (a first degree in engineering) to a U.S. master's degree (a second degree in engineering).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO preferred the peer-reviewed AACRAO EDGE information over the private credential evaluation, finding that the Inzinier degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The evaluator's opinion was based solely on program length, not content, and failed to compare the Inzinier program (a first degree in engineering) to a U.S. master's degree (a second degree in engineering).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_06_B5203; source_row=14100 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
An employer's racially motivated preference that makes labor certification unavailable does not serve the national interest. The petitioner has submitted nothing showing the beneficiary's services are objectively superior to those of other qualified dentists, and the patients would still have access to a qualified dentist regardless.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
An employer's racially motivated preference that makes labor certification unavailable does not serve the national interest. The petitioner has submitted nothing showing the beneficiary's services are objectively superior to those of other qualified dentists, and the patients would still have access to a qualified dentist regardless.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_03_B5203; source_row=14094 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c