Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 23461–23470
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The number of patients the beneficiary could treat would be a negligible fraction of the U.S. population. The petitioner has not established that the clinical work of one dentist is national in scope. The provisional patent application does not constitute holding a patent, was filed after the petition, and the inventor argument was introduced only in response to the RFE as an impermissible material change.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The number of patients the beneficiary could treat would be a negligible fraction of the U.S. population. The petitioner has not established that the clinical work of one dentist is national in scope. The provisional patent application does not constitute holding a patent, was filed after the petition, and the inventor argument was introduced only in response to the RFE as an impermissible material change.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_03_B5203; source_row=14093 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
After initial doubts in the notice of intent to deny, the director ultimately acknowledged the national scope of the petitioner's work, and AAO does not disturb that finding.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
After initial doubts in the notice of intent to deny, the director ultimately acknowledged the national scope of the petitioner's work, and AAO does not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_02_B5203; source_row=14090 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
benefit to national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees with the director that the petitioner failed to demonstrate, through objective and corroborative evidence, a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. The witness letters lacked specific details, the booklet's actual influence was not documented, and reliance on the employer's reputation does not substitute for individualized achievement.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees with the director that the petitioner failed to demonstrate, through objective and corroborative evidence, a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. The witness letters lacked specific details, the booklet's actual influence was not documented, and reliance on the employer's reputation does not substitute for individualized achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_02_B5203; source_row=14091 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to submit evidence of his personal impact or contributions in the field. He provided only general descriptions of his employers' significance without documenting his own role or showing that his contributions set him apart from other software engineers. Going on record without supporting documentary evidence is insufficient to meet the burden of proof.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to submit evidence of his personal impact or contributions in the field. He provided only general descriptions of his employers' significance without documenting his own role or showing that his contributions set him apart from other software engineers. Going on record without supporting documentary evidence is insufficient to meet the burden of proof.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_08_B5203; source_row=14103 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the development of security software and related products is national in scope because these materials can often be widely disseminated.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the development of security software and related products is national in scope because these materials can often be widely disseminated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-04-02_08_B5203; source_row=14102 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the supporting letter unsupported by the referenced website and held that being an adjudicator/instructor/coach does not equate to formal participation as a judge of the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the supporting letter unsupported by the referenced website and held that being an adjudicator/instructor/coach does not equate to formal participation as a judge of the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_05_B2203; source_row=14069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that the evidence reflected only competition rules, not membership requirements demonstrating outstanding achievements as judged by national or international experts; further, the petitioner claimed only a single membership while the regulation requires the plural.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the evidence reflected only competition rules, not membership requirements demonstrating outstanding achievements as judged by national or international experts; further, the petitioner claimed only a single membership while the regulation requires the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_05_B2203; source_row=14068 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the award did not meet the very narrow standard for a major, internationally recognized award analogous to the Nobel Prize, Pulitzer, Academy Award, or Olympic Medal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the award did not meet the very narrow standard for a major, internationally recognized award analogous to the Nobel Prize, Pulitzer, Academy Award, or Olympic Medal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_05_B2203; source_row=14066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c