Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 23471–23480
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles were primarily about others (a Filipino award nominee and a performing arts academy), not the petitioner. The news segment did not even mention the petitioner by name. The photographs lacked the required title, date, and author. The two articles about the petitioner were filed after the petition date and could not be used.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles were primarily about others (a Filipino award nominee and a performing arts academy), not the petitioner. The news segment did not even mention the petitioner by name. The photographs lacked the required title, date, and author. The two articles about the petitioner were filed after the petition date and could not be used. Even if one item qualified, the criterion requires evidence in 'professional or major trade publications or other major media' in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_02_B2203; source_row=14046 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Wikipedia evidence was unreliable. Magazine publications were considered under the separate published material criterion and do not presumptively satisfy this criterion. Reference letters showed impact on individual projects or departments, not on the field as a whole. The letters lacked specificity and were not corroborated. Merely applying make-up to celebrities does not constitute a contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Wikipedia evidence was unreliable. Magazine publications were considered under the separate published material criterion and do not presumptively satisfy this criterion. Reference letters showed impact on individual projects or departments, not on the field as a whole. The letters lacked specificity and were not corroborated. Merely applying make-up to celebrities does not constitute a contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_02_B2203; source_row=14048 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence showed only that the petitioner was asked and agreed to judge, not that she actually participated as a judge. The plain language requires evidence of actual participation.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence showed only that the petitioner was asked and agreed to judge, not that she actually participated as a judge. The plain language requires evidence of actual participation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_04_B2203; source_row=14061 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the ten submitted items fully satisfied the criterion. Most lacked the required title, date, and/or author; were not about the petitioner relating to her work; or failed to establish that the publication qualified as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
None of the ten submitted items fully satisfied the criterion. Most lacked the required title, date, and/or author; were not about the petitioner relating to her work; or failed to establish that the publication qualified as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_04_B2203; source_row=14060 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Only one award was shown to be nationally recognized, but the regulation requires more than one qualifying prize or award (plural). The other award lacked documentary evidence of national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Only one award was shown to be nationally recognized, but the regulation requires more than one qualifying prize or award (plural). The other award lacked documentary evidence of national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_04_B2203; source_row=14059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of her salary, and the supporting letter did not qualify as an affidavit. Furthermore, the comparative salary data was drawn from general chief executives rather than chief executives in the tourism or car rental field, so the petitioner failed to show a high salary in relation to others in her specific field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of her salary, and the supporting letter did not qualify as an affidavit. Furthermore, the comparative salary data was drawn from general chief executives rather than chief executives in the tourism or car rental field, so the petitioner failed to show a high salary in relation to others in her specific field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_04_B2203; source_row=14063 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that a three-year foreign bachelor's degree does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate under Matter of Shah. The combination of the three-year degree and a polytechnic diploma does not equal a single foreign equivalent degree.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that a three-year foreign bachelor's degree does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate under Matter of Shah. The combination of the three-year degree and a polytechnic diploma does not equal a single foreign equivalent degree. The credential evaluations were given less weight because they were inconsistent with EDGE database information showing that a diploma in engineering is comparable to only up to one year of U.S. university study and that three-year B.S. programs in India are equivalent to only two to three years of U.S. study.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_05_B5203; source_row=14072 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with EDGE's assessment that the Diplome d'Ingenieur is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The Master degree equivalency in EDGE refers to the university-based L-M-D degree structure, not to the Grande Ecole credential. The U.S. five-year BS/MS programs integrate two separate degrees while the Diplome d'Ingenieur is a single degree.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with EDGE's assessment that the Diplome d'Ingenieur is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The Master degree equivalency in EDGE refers to the university-based L-M-D degree structure, not to the Grande Ecole credential. The U.S. five-year BS/MS programs integrate two separate degrees while the Diplome d'Ingenieur is a single degree. The submitted credential evaluations were discounted because they equated a first-degree professional credential in France to a second-degree credential in the U.S. without adequate explanation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_07_B5203; source_row=14074 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Only one pre-denial letter evidenced any membership, failing the regulatory requirement for plural 'professional associations.' Moreover, the petitioner did not show that the organization in question qualifies as a 'professional association' because the beneficiary's occupation is not listed in INA § 101(a)(32) and no bachelor's degree requirement was shown. New membership letters submitted on appeal were untimely.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Only one pre-denial letter evidenced any membership, failing the regulatory requirement for plural 'professional associations.' Moreover, the petitioner did not show that the organization in question qualifies as a 'professional association' because the beneficiary's occupation is not listed in INA § 101(a)(32) and no bachelor's degree requirement was shown. New membership letters submitted on appeal were untimely.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_02_B5203; source_row=14054 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new salary evidence was submitted for the first time on appeal after the director's RFE specifically requested compensation evidence. The 2009 tax return showed no salaries paid. The CPA letter's assertion of current compensation does not establish compensation at the time of filing, and the claimed amount does not demonstrate exceptional ability in any event.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new salary evidence was submitted for the first time on appeal after the director's RFE specifically requested compensation evidence. The 2009 tax return showed no salaries paid. The CPA letter's assertion of current compensation does not establish compensation at the time of filing, and the claimed amount does not demonstrate exceptional ability in any event. Evidence withheld until appeal cannot cure the failure to respond to the RFE.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-30_02_B5203; source_row=14053 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c