Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The dissertations were not in professional or major trade publications. The single coauthored article does not satisfy the plural 'articles' requirement of the regulation. No citation evidence was submitted showing independent scholars had cited the beneficiary's work.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The dissertations were not in professional or major trade publications. The single coauthored article does not satisfy the plural 'articles' requirement of the regulation. No citation evidence was submitted showing independent scholars had cited the beneficiary's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=13865 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
FinancePhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters lacked specific examples of how the beneficiary's work impacted the field beyond his employers and clients. There was no evidence of independent citation of his dissertation, widespread application of his models, or recognition in the trade media. Contributions to one's employer or clients are not necessarily contributions of major significance to the field at large.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters lacked specific examples of how the beneficiary's work impacted the field beyond his employers and clients. There was no evidence of independent citation of his dissertation, widespread application of his models, or recognition in the trade media. Contributions to one's employer or clients are not necessarily contributions of major significance to the field at large.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=13864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
FinancePhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's finding that this criterion was met. The salary survey was limited to the Miami area and did not compare the beneficiary to Heads of Corporate Strategy, CFOs, and CROs in the hedge fund industry. The record lacked evidence that the beneficiary's compensation constituted significantly high remuneration compared to the most experienced executives in the hedge fund industry.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding that this criterion was met. The salary survey was limited to the Miami area and did not compare the beneficiary to Heads of Corporate Strategy, CFOs, and CROs in the hedge fund industry. The record lacked evidence that the beneficiary's compensation constituted significantly high remuneration compared to the most experienced executives in the hedge fund industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=13867 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While internal employee performance reviews and participation on a hiring panel technically meet the plain language of criterion (iv), these activities do not rise to the level of formal judging in the field and do not demonstrate national or international acclaim. Training coordination and consulting advice to clients do not constitute judging.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
While internal employee performance reviews and participation on a hiring panel technically meet the plain language of criterion (iv), these activities do not rise to the level of formal judging in the field and do not demonstrate national or international acclaim. Training coordination and consulting advice to clients do not constitute judging.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=13863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awards submitted were regional high school honors, institutional academic awards, a student newspaper recognition, and a graduate scholarship—none of which qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in finance or business. Academic performance and scholarships are not equivalent to excellence in the field of endeavor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards submitted were regional high school honors, institutional academic awards, a student newspaper recognition, and a graduate scholarship—none of which qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in finance or business. Academic performance and scholarships are not equivalent to excellence in the field of endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=13861 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The W-2s and pay stubs were issued by a third-party entity with no demonstrated affiliation to the petitioner, so could not be used to establish the petitioner's ability to pay. Even if considered, the amounts paid ($59,518 in 2007 and $60,414 in 2008) fell below the proffered annual wage of $84,073.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The W-2s and pay stubs were issued by a third-party entity with no demonstrated affiliation to the petitioner, so could not be used to establish the petitioner's ability to pay. Even if considered, the amounts paid ($59,518 in 2007 and $60,414 in 2008) fell below the proffered annual wage of $84,073.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B5203; source_row=13869 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO considered the totality of circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa but found no paralleling facts sufficient to establish ability to pay. The record lacked any financial evidence on or after the priority date, the petitioner had not shown the beneficiary was replacing a former employee, and the petitioner's multiple concurrent immigrant petitions further undermined the ability-to-pay showing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO considered the totality of circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa but found no paralleling facts sufficient to establish ability to pay. The record lacked any financial evidence on or after the priority date, the petitioner had not shown the beneficiary was replacing a former employee, and the petitioner's multiple concurrent immigrant petitions further undermined the ability-to-pay showing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B5203; source_row=13872 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The only tax return on record (fiscal year 2006, ending August 31, 2007) showed net income of $8,125, which is well below the proffered wage of $84,073. The petitioner's unsupported assertion that this figure reflected post-consultancy-fee income was rejected for lack of documentary evidence. No 2007 or later returns were submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The only tax return on record (fiscal year 2006, ending August 31, 2007) showed net income of $8,125, which is well below the proffered wage of $84,073. The petitioner's unsupported assertion that this figure reflected post-consultancy-fee income was rejected for lack of documentary evidence. No 2007 or later returns were submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_01_B5203; source_row=13870 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the petitioner's participation as a completions reviewer for internal company projects and for the company's other ventures met the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner's participation as a completions reviewer for internal company projects and for the company's other ventures met the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-02-23_02_B2203; source_row=13876 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c