Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23741–23750

EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

Even considering all evidence in aggregate, including his recognition by Gerente Magazine, the Bizz Award, ACRIP membership, HBSP participation, and employment in human resources, the petitioner's accomplishments did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he was among that small percentage at the very top of the field.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Even considering all evidence in aggregate, including his recognition by Gerente Magazine, the Bizz Award, ACRIP membership, HBSP participation, and employment in human resources, the petitioner's accomplishments did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he was among that small percentage at the very top of the field. The judging evidence was stale (12+ years before filing) and the evidence overall consisted largely of self-promotional material and unsupported assertions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13758
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

one-time achievement (major internationally recognized award)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO conducted de novo review and found the award did not rise to the level of a major internationally recognized award. The petitioner only submitted self-promotional websites of the awarding organization without independent objective evidence of the award's international recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO conducted de novo review and found the award did not rise to the level of a major internationally recognized award. The petitioner only submitted self-promotional websites of the awarding organization without independent objective evidence of the award's international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13748
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the PowerPoint submission lacked a certified English translation and therefore carried no weight. The employer letter only described contributions to a single company rather than to the field as a whole, and failed to explain the significance of the petitioner's work.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the PowerPoint submission lacked a certified English translation and therefore carried no weight. The employer letter only described contributions to a single company rather than to the field as a whole, and failed to explain the significance of the petitioner's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13753
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The recommendation letters merely praised the petitioner's work ethic but did not show his roles were leading or critical to the organizations as a whole. The appeal evidence for the CAFAM role consisted only of photographs and untranslated foreign language documents that did not establish the claimed board membership or distinguished reputation of CAFAM.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters merely praised the petitioner's work ethic but did not show his roles were leading or critical to the organizations as a whole. The appeal evidence for the CAFAM role consisted only of photographs and untranslated foreign language documents that did not establish the claimed board membership or distinguished reputation of CAFAM.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13755
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the director's finding because the petitioner failed to submit independent evidence beyond self-promotional sources showing the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The group certificates also did not constitute personal receipt of an award.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the petitioner failed to submit independent evidence beyond self-promotional sources showing the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The group certificates also did not constitute personal receipt of an award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13749
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the gestionhumana.com screenshots were not scholarly articles (not peer-reviewed, not containing source references), the MBA thesis lacked full certified translation and evidence of publication in major media, and the book was not an 'article' as required by the regulation.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the gestionhumana.com screenshots were not scholarly articles (not peer-reviewed, not containing source references), the MBA thesis lacked full certified translation and evidence of publication in major media, and the book was not an 'article' as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13754
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that she meets the plain language of the regulation for authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications. AAO withdrew the director's contrary finding.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating that she meets the plain language of the regulation for authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications. AAO withdrew the director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_02_B2203; source_row=13764
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 73 citations showed only moderate interest; recommendation letters speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating present acclaim; peer review participation was minimal and not reflective of top-of-field status; and the overall record did not establish a career of acclaimed work placing her at the very top of her field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 73 citations showed only moderate interest; recommendation letters speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating present acclaim; peer review participation was minimal and not reflective of top-of-field status; and the overall record did not establish a career of acclaimed work placing her at the very top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_02_B2203; source_row=13767
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO withdrew the director's finding and determined that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentation establishing that he meets the plain language of this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding and determined that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentation establishing that he meets the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B2203; source_row=13752
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Labor certification educational requirements consistent with advanced degree professional classification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) uses the singular 'foreign equivalent degree,' meaning a combination of lesser credentials cannot substitute. The labor certification's allowance for a combination of foreign education falling below a single bachelor's-equivalent degree is inconsistent with the advanced degree professional classification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) uses the singular 'foreign equivalent degree,' meaning a combination of lesser credentials cannot substitute. The labor certification's allowance for a combination of foreign education falling below a single bachelor's-equivalent degree is inconsistent with the advanced degree professional classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-25_01_B5203; source_row=13759
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment