Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 23771–23780

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

Certificates of participation do not constitute prizes or awards reflecting excellence. The remaining claimed awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition; letters about selection methodology and athlete progression charts show a national candidate pool but do not establish the awards themselves received national or international recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Certificates of participation do not constitute prizes or awards reflecting excellence. The remaining claimed awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition; letters about selection methodology and athlete progression charts show a national candidate pool but do not establish the awards themselves received national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=13715
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The World Kuo Shu Federation admits any qualifying organization and is not restricted to those with outstanding achievements; a club's group membership does not qualify under the plain language. The World United Martial Arts Federation-Nepal technical membership requires outstanding achievements but the letter does not establish that admittance is judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The World Kuo Shu Federation admits any qualifying organization and is not restricted to those with outstanding achievements; a club's group membership does not qualify under the plain language. The World United Martial Arts Federation-Nepal technical membership requires outstanding achievements but the letter does not establish that admittance is judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=13716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters failed to describe the duties or significance of the petitioner's contributions to the organizations. The petitioner relied on job titles rather than substantive evidence of a leading or critical role. The petitioner also failed to provide evidence that the organizations enjoyed a distinguished reputation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters failed to describe the duties or significance of the petitioner's contributions to the organizations. The petitioner relied on job titles rather than substantive evidence of a leading or critical role. The petitioner also failed to provide evidence that the organizations enjoyed a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=13721
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

The totality of evidence—old unrecognized awards, one qualifying association membership without expert-judged admission, media coverage not about the petitioner, judging primarily at regional competitions, and unsubstantiated organizational roles—showed an experienced athlete but not one who has achieved sustained national or international acclaim or risen to the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence—old unrecognized awards, one qualifying association membership without expert-judged admission, media coverage not about the petitioner, judging primarily at regional competitions, and unsubstantiated organizational roles—showed an experienced athlete but not one who has achieved sustained national or international acclaim or risen to the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=13722
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical20 papers

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The primary reference letter was found to contain false information and thus has no evidentiary value. The remaining letters contained only vague accolades without specific examples of how the petitioner's work impacted the field of alternative medicine, and lacked corroborating evidence.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The primary reference letter was found to contain false information and thus has no evidentiary value. The remaining letters contained only vague accolades without specific examples of how the petitioner's work impacted the field of alternative medicine, and lacked corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_02_B2203; source_row=13726
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed that the petitioner's consulting activities were geographically limited. The invoices submitted to show national scope actually showed the petitioner herself purchasing supplies, and no evidence was offered that the business she cited even continued to exist or was successful. The claimed chain of national economic impact was speculative.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the petitioner's consulting activities were geographically limited. The invoices submitted to show national scope actually showed the petitioner herself purchasing supplies, and no evidence was offered that the business she cited even continued to exist or was successful. The claimed chain of national economic impact was speculative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=13732
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found the petitioner lacked a demonstrable track record of influential achievement. Her witness letters were vague or lacked corroborating evidence; her publications were aimed at the Filipino-American community with no evidence of broader influence; her one cited consulting example (the bakery café) lacked evidence of success; her prospective client letters were speculative; and her immigration status did not excus…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner lacked a demonstrable track record of influential achievement. Her witness letters were vague or lacked corroborating evidence; her publications were aimed at the Filipino-American community with no evidence of broader influence; her one cited consulting example (the bakery café) lacked evidence of success; her prospective client letters were speculative; and her immigration status did not excuse the absence of a qualifying track record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=13733
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

member of the professions holding an advanced degree

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO held that the director's reliance on 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i) was misplaced because that provision presupposes a job offer and labor certification, which is inapplicable when a waiver is sought. The petitioner's occupation qualifies as a profession requiring at least a bachelor's degree, and the director did not dispute her advanced degree.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO held that the director's reliance on 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i) was misplaced because that provision presupposes a job offer and labor certification, which is inapplicable when a waiver is sought. The petitioner's occupation qualifies as a profession requiring at least a bachelor's degree, and the director did not dispute her advanced degree. Therefore the petitioner is a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=13730
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO withdrew the director's denial, finding qualifying evidence in the South Asian Wushu Championship 2000, the Leo 4th Inter School Wushu Championship certificate, the five National Sports Council letters of appreciation from 1996, and the 2008 tournament pamphlet. Certain other certificates (WUMAF-Nepal 2001 and 2003, undated National Sports Council letter) were insufficient.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's denial, finding qualifying evidence in the South Asian Wushu Championship 2000, the Leo 4th Inter School Wushu Championship certificate, the five National Sports Council letters of appreciation from 1996, and the 2008 tournament pamphlet. Certain other certificates (WUMAF-Nepal 2001 and 2003, undated National Sports Council letter) were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=13718
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

Whether labor certification demonstrates a professional position requiring an advanced degree

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) only requires a baccalaureate degree for entry into the occupation, without specifying a particular field of study. The INS decisions relied on by the Director predate this regulation and must yield to it. O*NET data confirms most jobs in the occupation require a bachelor's degree, consistent with the labor certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) only requires a baccalaureate degree for entry into the occupation, without specifying a particular field of study. The INS decisions relied on by the Director predate this regulation and must yield to it. O*NET data confirms most jobs in the occupation require a bachelor's degree, consistent with the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-20_02_B5203; source_row=13714
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment