Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 24161–24170
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's work benefits individual employers locally, not the nation as a whole. Job creation at one factory is not national in scope merely because job seekers can relocate, and the speculative claim that the petitioner's methods will spread via employee movement is unsupported conjecture. Working for multiple employers over time does not make any individual position national in scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's work benefits individual employers locally, not the nation as a whole. Job creation at one factory is not national in scope merely because job seekers can relocate, and the speculative claim that the petitioner's methods will spread via employee movement is unsupported conjecture. Working for multiple employers over time does not make any individual position national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-26_03_B5203; source_row=13293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
Counsel raised the original contributions criterion for the first time on appeal without referring to any documentary evidence, and offered no argument demonstrating director error.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Counsel raised the original contributions criterion for the first time on appeal without referring to any documentary evidence, and offered no argument demonstrating director error.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=13288 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's affidavit did not mention any published material about the petitioner relating to her work, and counsel's general assertions were unsupported.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's affidavit did not mention any published material about the petitioner relating to her work, and counsel's general assertions were unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=13286 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's affidavit referenced competition participation and placements but failed to address the national or international recognition for excellence required under the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's affidavit referenced competition participation and placements but failed to address the national or international recognition for excellence required under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=13285 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
What the decision said
Neither the petitioner's affidavit nor counsel's appeal arguments contested the director's finding on the high salary criterion; AAO deemed this issue abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Neither the petitioner's affidavit nor counsel's appeal arguments contested the director's finding on the high salary criterion; AAO deemed this issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-20_02_B2203; source_row=13289 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's leading/critical role in creating a single short film does not meet the regulatory requirement of a role for organizations or establishments. The letters from industry members did not establish that the petitioner played a leading or critical role for any of the named organizations, nor did the petitioner establish the distinguished reputation of those organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's leading/critical role in creating a single short film does not meet the regulatory requirement of a role for organizations or establishments. The letters from industry members did not establish that the petitioner played a leading or critical role for any of the named organizations, nor did the petitioner establish the distinguished reputation of those organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-18_01_B2203; source_row=13274 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
All compensation evidence related to future work occurring after the petition's priority date. The regulation requires the alien 'has commanded' a high salary, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. The petitioner submitted no evidence of high past salary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
All compensation evidence related to future work occurring after the petition's priority date. The regulation requires the alien 'has commanded' a high salary, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing. The petitioner submitted no evidence of high past salary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-18_01_B2203; source_row=13275 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The totality of the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The single qualifying award was limited to the narrow field of short films; media articles failed translation requirements; being Academy Award short-listed was noteworthy but insufficient; film festival showings and industry letters lacked indicators of top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The single qualifying award was limited to the narrow field of short films; media articles failed translation requirements; being Academy Award short-listed was noteworthy but insufficient; film festival showings and industry letters lacked indicators of top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-10-18_01_B2203; source_row=13277 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c