Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 24241–24250
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The totality of evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner's awards were student-limited, memberships did not require outstanding achievement, peer review was routine, citations were minimal (fewer than a dozen, including self-citations), and expert letters focused on future impact rather than established significance as of the filing date.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner's awards were student-limited, memberships did not require outstanding achievement, peer review was routine, citations were minimal (fewer than a dozen, including self-citations), and expert letters focused on future impact rather than established significance as of the filing date. The petitioner's references had far more impressive credentials, suggesting the very top of the field was far above the petitioner's level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=13191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary holds advanced degree or foreign equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the petitioner failed to submit a certified English translation of the foreign transcript and failed to submit the foreign degree itself; the credentials evaluation cannot substitute for primary evidence that exists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the petitioner failed to submit a certified English translation of the foreign transcript and failed to submit the foreign degree itself; the credentials evaluation cannot substitute for primary evidence that exists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_03_B5203; source_row=13205 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires advanced degree or equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdraws the director's finding that the labor certification required a DVM, concluding instead that the DVM was claimed only as a special skill in Part B. However, AAO finds the labor certification only required a bachelor's degree, which is insufficient to qualify the position for EB-2 advanced-degree classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdraws the director's finding that the labor certification required a DVM, concluding instead that the DVM was claimed only as a special skill in Part B. However, AAO finds the labor certification only required a bachelor's degree, which is insufficient to qualify the position for EB-2 advanced-degree classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_03_B5203; source_row=13206 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via wages actually paid to beneficiary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's W-2 forms showed compensation less than the proffered wage of $80,000, so the petitioner needed to show ability to pay the difference through other means.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's W-2 forms showed compensation less than the proffered wage of $80,000, so the petitioner needed to show ability to pay the difference through other means.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_02_B5203; source_row=13194 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via totality of business circumstances (Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Under Sonegawa, AAO may consider overall business magnitude including years in business, historical growth, reputation, and number of employees. Here, the petitioner provided no evidence of its reputation or historical growth, and the filing of at least 1,400 petitions for only 240 employees called into question the realism of the job offer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Under Sonegawa, AAO may consider overall business magnitude including years in business, historical growth, reputation, and number of employees. Here, the petitioner provided no evidence of its reputation or historical growth, and the filing of at least 1,400 petitions for only 240 employees called into question the realism of the job offer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_02_B5203; source_row=13197 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's net current assets for 2005–2007 were sufficient for the instant beneficiary alone, but given the volume of simultaneously pending petitions, the petitioner failed to establish that net current assets were sufficient to cover all sponsored beneficiaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's net current assets for 2005–2007 were sufficient for the instant beneficiary alone, but given the volume of simultaneously pending petitions, the petitioner failed to establish that net current assets were sufficient to cover all sponsored beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_02_B5203; source_row=13196 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While net income may have been sufficient for the instant beneficiary in isolation, the petitioner submitted W-2 forms for many employees but did not clarify which represented sponsored beneficiaries or provide proffered wages for all pending petitions, and USCIS records indicated a much larger number of additional petitions; thus the petitioner failed to show net income was sufficient across all simultaneously pending peti…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While net income may have been sufficient for the instant beneficiary in isolation, the petitioner submitted W-2 forms for many employees but did not clarify which represented sponsored beneficiaries or provide proffered wages for all pending petitions, and USCIS records indicated a much larger number of additional petitions; thus the petitioner failed to show net income was sufficient across all simultaneously pending petitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_02_B5203; source_row=13195 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's peer review of articles for several scientific journals and his position as Session Chair at the 2009 AES conference satisfies the plain language of this criterion, notwithstanding concerns about the 2006 conference role.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's peer review of articles for several scientific journals and his position as Session Chair at the 2009 AES conference satisfies the plain language of this criterion, notwithstanding concerns about the 2006 conference role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_03_B2203; source_row=13201 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that despite expert letters praising the petitioner's work, there was insufficient evidence of actual impact: fewer than a dozen citations (many self-citations), no evidence of widespread implementation of his models, and letters that spoke to future potential rather than existing significance as of the filing date.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that despite expert letters praising the petitioner's work, there was insufficient evidence of actual impact: fewer than a dozen citations (many self-citations), no evidence of widespread implementation of his models, and letters that spoke to future potential rather than existing significance as of the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-09-28_01_B2203; source_row=13189 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c