Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 24321–24330

NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Advanced degree or equivalent qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary's certificate was not the equivalent of a baccalaureate degree, employer letters had discrepant dates and failed to verify required skills, and neither letter indicated full-time or part-time status. Even assuming the certificate were equivalent to a baccalaureate, the missing specific date of acquisition precluded verification of five years of progressive experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's certificate was not the equivalent of a baccalaureate degree, employer letters had discrepant dates and failed to verify required skills, and neither letter indicated full-time or part-time status. Even assuming the certificate were equivalent to a baccalaureate, the missing specific date of acquisition precluded verification of five years of progressive experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_05_B5203; source_row=13113
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

No financial evidence covered the period from the November 8, 2007 priority date onward; unaudited financial statements are insufficient; and the promised 2007 tax return was never received, leaving the ability to pay unestablished.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
No financial evidence covered the period from the November 8, 2007 priority date onward; unaudited financial statements are insufficient; and the promised 2007 tax return was never received, leaving the ability to pay unestablished.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_06_B5203; source_row=13116
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2006 tax return pre-dates the November 8, 2007 priority date and cannot demonstrate ability to pay from that date forward. The reviewed (unaudited) financial statements do not satisfy the regulatory requirement for audited financial statements. The promised 2007 tax return was never submitted. Without any financial evidence from the priority date onward, the petitioner failed to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2006 tax return pre-dates the November 8, 2007 priority date and cannot demonstrate ability to pay from that date forward. The reviewed (unaudited) financial statements do not satisfy the regulatory requirement for audited financial statements. The promised 2007 tax return was never submitted. Without any financial evidence from the priority date onward, the petitioner failed to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_04_B5203; source_row=13112
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Labor certification job offer requires advanced degree professional or alien of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification's Part H.4 requires only a bachelor's degree in psychology or commerce with no experience, and the alternative combination in H.8 offers only a master's degree plus two years of experience. Neither option satisfies the regulatory requirement that the job offer demonstrate need for an advanced degree professional — specifically a bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification's Part H.4 requires only a bachelor's degree in psychology or commerce with no experience, and the alternative combination in H.8 offers only a master's degree plus two years of experience. Neither option satisfies the regulatory requirement that the job offer demonstrate need for an advanced degree professional — specifically a bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_04_B5203; source_row=13109
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Job offer requires advanced degree or exceptional ability / proper visa classification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed the labor certification did not support EB-2 classification, but found that because the director had invited amendment and the petitioner had signed a form requesting third-preference skilled worker adjudication, the petition should have been adjudicated under EB-3 rather than denied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the labor certification did not support EB-2 classification, but found that because the director had invited amendment and the petitioner had signed a form requesting third-preference skilled worker adjudication, the petition should have been adjudicated under EB-3 rather than denied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_02_B5203; source_row=13106
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The only financial evidence is a 2006 tax return predating the 2008 priority date, and there is no evidence of wages paid to the beneficiary, so the petitioner failed to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The only financial evidence is a 2006 tax return predating the 2008 priority date, and there is no evidence of wages paid to the beneficiary, so the petitioner failed to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_03_B5203; source_row=13108
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record contains no financial evidence covering the priority date of November 8, 2007 onward. The 2006 tax return predates the priority date and the promised 2007 tax return was never submitted. Unaudited financial statements are not persuasive evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). No wages paid to the beneficiary were documented.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record contains no financial evidence covering the priority date of November 8, 2007 onward. The 2006 tax return predates the priority date and the promised 2007 tax return was never submitted. Unaudited financial statements are not persuasive evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). No wages paid to the beneficiary were documented.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_07_B5203; source_row=13119
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

Labor certification requires advanced degree professional

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification's primary requirement of a bachelor's degree in psychology or commerce with no experience does not demonstrate that the job requires an advanced degree professional under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification's primary requirement of a bachelor's degree in psychology or commerce with no experience does not demonstrate that the job requires an advanced degree professional under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_07_B5203; source_row=13117
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

No financial evidence covers the November 8, 2007 priority date onward. The petitioner did not demonstrate it paid the beneficiary the proffered wage, did not submit audited financial statements, and never provided the promised 2007 tax return. The 2006 data alone is insufficient to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
No financial evidence covers the November 8, 2007 priority date onward. The petitioner did not demonstrate it paid the beneficiary the proffered wage, did not submit audited financial statements, and never provided the promised 2007 tax return. The 2006 data alone is insufficient to demonstrate continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-26_05_B5203; source_row=13114
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

Why the evidence was persuasive

Relying on EDGE and the credential evaluations, AAO concluded the beneficiary's three-year bachelor's plus Master of Computer Applications is comparable to a U.S. Master's degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Relying on EDGE and the credential evaluations, AAO concluded the beneficiary's three-year bachelor's plus Master of Computer Applications is comparable to a U.S. Master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-08-24_02_B5203; source_row=13104
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment