Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 26412650

NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

procedural or other

standard of proof applied by Director

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO rejected the argument because the Petitioner failed to identify any specific instance where a stricter standard was applied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the argument because the Petitioner failed to identify any specific instance where a stricter standard was applied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_15_B5203; source_row=41116
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination – exceptional ability

What the decision said

Because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, AAO did not conduct a final merits analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, AAO did not conduct a final merits analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41103
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license or certification for a particular profession or occupation

Why AAO was not persuaded

Union membership does not constitute a license or certification as required by the regulation's plain language. The Progressing Ballet Technique certification was unsupported by evidence of a requirement to teach ballet, and was undermined by its omission from an expert reference letter that documented hours for seven other courses.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Union membership does not constitute a license or certification as required by the regulation's plain language. The Progressing Ballet Technique certification was unsupported by evidence of a requirement to teach ballet, and was undermined by its omission from an expert reference letter that documented hours for seven other courses.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41099
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

The recommendation and expert opinion letters did not constitute evidence of recognition for achievements and significant contributions, but rather reflected being held in high regard by recommenders. The expert letter merely restated the Petitioner's resume and offered general commentary on the arts industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The recommendation and expert opinion letters did not constitute evidence of recognition for achievements and significant contributions, but rather reflected being held in high regard by recommenders. The expert letter merely restated the Petitioner's resume and offered general commentary on the arts industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41102
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification, making adjudication of the NIW prongs unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification, making adjudication of the NIW prongs unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41104
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

academic record

official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner furnished documentation showing satisfactory completion of 800 hours of an actor training course, which AAO agreed meets the academic record criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner furnished documentation showing satisfactory completion of 800 hours of an actor training course, which AAO agreed meets the academic record criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41097
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The accountant letter does not qualify as a letter from a current or former employer, does not document full-time employment, and one recommender noted the dance academy closed during the pandemic. The plain-language requirements of the criterion were not met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The accountant letter does not qualify as a letter from a current or former employer, does not document full-time employment, and one recommender noted the dance academy closed during the pandemic. The plain-language requirements of the criterion were not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_12_B5203; source_row=41098
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director found and AAO confirmed that the Petitioner met this criterion, though AAO noted it is insufficient standing alone to establish extraordinary ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director found and AAO confirmed that the Petitioner met this criterion, though AAO noted it is insufficient standing alone to establish extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_01_B2203; source_row=41053
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's acclaim was concentrated in a narrow historical period, the support letters came primarily from immediate professional circles and lacked corroboration, citation figures were dominated by co-author self-citations, media coverage was eight years old, and the poster competition finalist recognition did not rise to the level of top-of-field acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's acclaim was concentrated in a narrow historical period, the support letters came primarily from immediate professional circles and lacked corroboration, citation figures were dominated by co-author self-citations, media coverage was eight years old, and the poster competition finalist recognition did not rise to the level of top-of-field acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_01_B2203; source_row=41054
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

Final merits determination — degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's educational credentials (a two-year technical nursing degree plus supplemental certificates) and recommendation letters describing him as 'calm,' 'professional,' and 'dedicated' did not demonstrate educational achievements or professional accomplishments beyond those normally expected of a nurse.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's educational credentials (a two-year technical nursing degree plus supplemental certificates) and recommendation letters describing him as 'calm,' 'professional,' and 'dedicated' did not demonstrate educational achievements or professional accomplishments beyond those normally expected of a nurse. Letters referencing 'exceptional qualities' were not corroborated by evidence of impact or recognition outside his employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_16_B5203; source_row=41118
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment