Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Meeting at least three of six exceptional ability criteria
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's findings on criteria B (ten years of experience) and E (professional associations), leaving only two criteria met (A and C), which falls below the required three.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's findings on criteria B (ten years of experience) and E (professional associations), leaving only two criteria met (A and C), which falls below the required three.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_16_B5203; source_row=41117 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first and second prongs, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first and second prongs, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_03_B5203; source_row=41073 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner provided general background on the construction field but failed to provide corroborating evidence directly linking her specific endeavor or company to the overall economy's growth or economically depressed areas. The expert letter, business plan projections, and recommendation letters lacked specificity about the proposed endeavor's prospective national-level impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner provided general background on the construction field but failed to provide corroborating evidence directly linking her specific endeavor or company to the overall economy's growth or economically depressed areas. The expert letter, business plan projections, and recommendation letters lacked specificity about the proposed endeavor's prospective national-level impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_03_B5203; source_row=41071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance, noting the Petitioner's contention that the Director 'failed to comprehend' the endeavor was misplaced because the Director had already found this prong met.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance, noting the Petitioner's contention that the Director 'failed to comprehend' the endeavor was misplaced because the Director had already found this prong met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_20_B5203; source_row=41128 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While AAO disagreed with the Director's exclusion of post-filing letters and considered them, AAO concluded the letters were testimonials lacking detail and did not show the methodology has impacted the broader field of fitness training.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While AAO disagreed with the Director's exclusion of post-filing letters and considered them, AAO concluded the letters were testimonials lacking detail and did not show the methodology has impacted the broader field of fitness training.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_03_B2203; source_row=41066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Director referenced unrelated documents in the third-prong analysis and failed to address the Petitioner's actual arguments and evidence, or explain the relative decisional weight given to each balancing factor. AAO remanded for proper analysis.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director referenced unrelated documents in the third-prong analysis and failed to address the Petitioner's actual arguments and evidence, or explain the relative decisional weight given to each balancing factor. AAO remanded for proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-30_02_B5203; source_row=41064 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c