Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 2901–2910
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic EngineeringEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the leading or critical role criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold of three criteria, making this issue unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the leading or critical role criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold of three criteria, making this issue unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_02_B2203; source_row=40662 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the second prong, noting the evidence predominantly demonstrates his past experience, work history, and accomplishments which relate to whether he is well-positioned.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the second prong, noting the evidence predominantly demonstrates his past experience, work history, and accomplishments which relate to whether he is well-positioned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=40674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence showed impact on individual users and employers but did not demonstrate broader national or global implications in the software quality assurance field.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence showed impact on individual users and employers but did not demonstrate broader national or global implications in the software quality assurance field. The recommendation letters did not show solutions were shared beyond individual companies, the teaching proposals lacked metrics demonstrating broader impact on STEM education, and the open source evidence did not explain how the tools were being used industry-wide. Citing STEM priorities does not substitute for showing the specific endeavor's national impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=40673 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director's analysis erroneous and conflicting, noting the Director disregarded the Petitioner's stated intention to continue as a competitive triathlete. Upon de novo review, AAO concluded the 2022 bronze medal and supporting evidence of the competition's reputation and contemporaneous media coverage satisfied the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis erroneous and conflicting, noting the Director disregarded the Petitioner's stated intention to continue as a competitive triathlete. Upon de novo review, AAO concluded the 2022 bronze medal and supporting evidence of the competition's reputation and contemporaneous media coverage satisfied the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=40650 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to fully conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but in the aggregate found the record insufficient to establish the required level of acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to fully conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but in the aggregate found the record insufficient to establish the required level of acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=40654 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c