Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 29812990

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the Petitioner's work gained broad exposure through a software application splash screen and marketing campaigns, and letters showed other artists respect his style, the evidence did not demonstrate that his work widely impacted or influenced other artists or the broader field of digital art at the level of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner's work gained broad exposure through a software application splash screen and marketing campaigns, and letters showed other artists respect his style, the evidence did not demonstrate that his work widely impacted or influenced other artists or the broader field of digital art at the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_01_B2203; source_row=40527
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

member of professions holding advanced degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that lodging manager positions require only a high school diploma as the typical entry-level education per the petitioner's own evidence, meaning the occupation does not qualify as a 'profession' requiring a baccalaureate degree as the minimum entry requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that lodging manager positions require only a high school diploma as the typical entry-level education per the petitioner's own evidence, meaning the occupation does not qualify as a 'profession' requiring a baccalaureate degree as the minimum entry requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_02_B5203; source_row=40535
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner made an impermissible material change to the proposed endeavor. After adjudicating under the original fact pattern, AAO found insufficient evidence to show the initial endeavor—working as a lodging manager while exploring business opportunities—has substantial merit or national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner made an impermissible material change to the proposed endeavor. After adjudicating under the original fact pattern, AAO found insufficient evidence to show the initial endeavor—working as a lodging manager while exploring business opportunities—has substantial merit or national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_02_B5203; source_row=40536
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The nearly 500 pages of industry reports showed the importance of renewable energy generally, but not the specific prospective impact of the Petitioner's endeavor. The business plan's financial and staffing projections (80 jobs, $2.7M in tax revenue) lacked sufficient evidentiary basis and were not corroborated by independent evidence.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The nearly 500 pages of industry reports showed the importance of renewable energy generally, but not the specific prospective impact of the Petitioner's endeavor. The business plan's financial and staffing projections (80 jobs, $2.7M in tax revenue) lacked sufficient evidentiary basis and were not corroborated by independent evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_03_B5203; source_row=40539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's reliance on STEM-field status was misplaced because merely working within a STEM profession does not establish national importance — the evidence must show the endeavor actually advances STEM technologies and research with broad implications, which was not demonstrated here.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's reliance on STEM-field status was misplaced because merely working within a STEM profession does not establish national importance — the evidence must show the endeavor actually advances STEM technologies and research with broad implications, which was not demonstrated here.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_04_B5203; source_row=40542
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

Counsel's unsubstantiated assertions are not evidence; the AAO had previously analyzed the evidence in context, and the Petitioner did not show legal or policy error in the final merits determination. The AAO cannot credit unrealized future accomplishments.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Counsel's unsubstantiated assertions are not evidence; the AAO had previously analyzed the evidence in context, and the Petitioner did not show legal or policy error in the final merits determination. The AAO cannot credit unrealized future accomplishments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_02_B2203; source_row=40534
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO held that dissemination of work is not itself proof of major significance; employer letters described importance to the business but not impact beyond it; and the Petitioner's request to 'assume' impact on major clients lacked contemporaneous probative evidence.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The AAO held that dissemination of work is not itself proof of major significance; employer letters described importance to the business but not impact beyond it; and the Petitioner's request to 'assume' impact on major clients lacked contemporaneous probative evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_02_B2203; source_row=40530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's conclusion regarding criterion (iv) on appeal, and therefore the issue is considered waived.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's conclusion regarding criterion (iv) on appeal, and therefore the issue is considered waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-05_01_B2203; source_row=40526
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the foreign language employer letter was absent (only an English translation was submitted), making the evidence unreliable; and the comparison salary data from Russia's Federal State Statistics Service covered 'information and communication activities' broadly, not specifically the Petitioner's field of software and game development.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the foreign language employer letter was absent (only an English translation was submitted), making the evidence unreliable; and the comparison salary data from Russia's Federal State Statistics Service covered 'information and communication activities' broadly, not specifically the Petitioner's field of software and game development.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-04_06_B5203; source_row=40517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in professional associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the record did not show that either association requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent for membership, and thus neither was demonstrated to be a 'professional association' under the regulatory definition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the record did not show that either association requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent for membership, and thus neither was demonstrated to be a 'professional association' under the regulatory definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-04_06_B5203; source_row=40518
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment