Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3121–3130
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner addressed the overlapping employment issue, the updated employer letters lacked sufficient detail about duties and responsibilities to establish ten years of full-time experience in the relevant occupation of operating a company conducting music workshops for children and adolescents.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner addressed the overlapping employment issue, the updated employer letters lacked sufficient detail about duties and responsibilities to establish ten years of full-time experience in the relevant occupation of operating a company conducting music workshops for children and adolescents.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-27_11_B5203; source_row=40376 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner should not construe its adoption-and-affirmance approach as disagreement with the Director's conclusion that criterion C was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner should not construe its adoption-and-affirmance approach as disagreement with the Director's conclusion that criterion C was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-27_11_B5203; source_row=40377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner did not claim on appeal that she is an advanced degree professional or that the Director erred in not analyzing this ground, AAO deemed the issue waived.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner did not claim on appeal that she is an advanced degree professional or that the Director erred in not analyzing this ground, AAO deemed the issue waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-27_06_B5203; source_row=40354 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's financial and employment projections were speculative and unsupported, and failed to explain how his business activity would produce substantial positive economic effects at a national level. The expert and support letters addressed the Petitioner's personal attributes and the supply chain field generally but did not specifically connect his proposed endeavor to any broader national impact.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's financial and employment projections were speculative and unsupported, and failed to explain how his business activity would produce substantial positive economic effects at a national level. The expert and support letters addressed the Petitioner's personal attributes and the supply chain field generally but did not specifically connect his proposed endeavor to any broader national impact. Working in an important field is insufficient to establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_03_B5203; source_row=40255 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evidence showed substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's services would benefit his clients directly but lack the broader national implications Dhanasar requires. He also failed to provide adequate details about projected employment or revenue to show substantial economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence showed substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's services would benefit his clients directly but lack the broader national implications Dhanasar requires. He also failed to provide adequate details about projected employment or revenue to show substantial economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_15_B5203; source_row=40302 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the evidence insufficient to establish national importance, as the articles were generic, the business plan lacked support for projections and economically depressed area impact, and the expert/recommendation letters did not address broader field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the evidence insufficient to establish national importance, as the articles were generic, the business plan lacked support for projections and economically depressed area impact, and the expert/recommendation letters did not address broader field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_04_B5203; source_row=40258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's documentation focuses on the value of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact on the national level. The Petitioner's skills and expertise relate to the second prong, not the first, and the record does not show broader implications beyond prospective clients or employers.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's documentation focuses on the value of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact on the national level. The Petitioner's skills and expertise relate to the second prong, not the first, and the record does not show broader implications beyond prospective clients or employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_08_B5203; source_row=40275 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the totality of evidence did not establish expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. The Petitioner's course completions, licenses, memberships, and recommendation letters described the qualifications of test/technical pilots generally but did not demonstrate the Petitioner's specific expertise was significantly above others in the field.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence did not establish expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. The Petitioner's course completions, licenses, memberships, and recommendation letters described the qualifications of test/technical pilots generally but did not demonstrate the Petitioner's specific expertise was significantly above others in the field. Letters of recommendation focused on field requirements rather than the Petitioner's individual standing relative to peers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_07_B5203; source_row=40271 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or exceptional ability qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit an official academic record as required by regulation, and his submissions did not establish the names of degree-issuing institutions, years attended, or whether studies were full-time. AAO withdrew the Director's determination. The exceptional ability basis was waived as not argued.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit an official academic record as required by regulation, and his submissions did not establish the names of degree-issuing institutions, years attended, or whether studies were full-time. AAO withdrew the Director's determination. The exceptional ability basis was waived as not argued.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_12_B5203; source_row=40291 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's past research and work focused on West African climate and weather, and the record did not demonstrate he actually developed climate models, gained interest from potential U.S. employers or investors, or that his expertise translates to advancing climate modeling work impacting the United States. Citations to his research by others were largely about West African weather.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's past research and work focused on West African climate and weather, and the record did not demonstrate he actually developed climate models, gained interest from potential U.S. employers or investors, or that his expertise translates to advancing climate modeling work impacting the United States. Citations to his research by others were largely about West African weather. Recommendation letters praised his West Africa-focused work but did not show development of models impacting the U.S. Peer-review activities and the proposed plan were similarly insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-26_12_B5203; source_row=40293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c