Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3301–3310
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other900 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director overlooked multiple items of evidence: the global significance of the Petitioner's COVID-19/cardiac research (including an FDA warning issued days after his study's publication), his LVAD research advancing treatment options for patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, his CIED research reducing patient discharge times, independent expert letters attesting to his unique contributions and influence…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director overlooked multiple items of evidence: the global significance of the Petitioner's COVID-19/cardiac research (including an FDA warning issued days after his study's publication), his LVAD research advancing treatment options for patients with severe pulmonary hypertension, his CIED research reducing patient discharge times, independent expert letters attesting to his unique contributions and influence on clinical guidelines, and a citation rate placing him in the top 1% of clinical medicine authors. These overlooked materials, considered together, established extraordinary ability by a preponderance of the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=40018 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to meet prong one. AAO noted in passing that the resubmitted evidence was more relevant to prong two but did not adjudicate it.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to meet prong one. AAO noted in passing that the resubmitted evidence was more relevant to prong two but did not adjudicate it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_09_B5203; source_row=40067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
exceptional ability – at least three of six criteria
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach this issue because the NIW analysis is dispositive; a ruling on EB-2 exceptional ability classification is unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this issue because the NIW analysis is dispositive; a ruling on EB-2 exceptional ability classification is unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_07_B5203; source_row=40059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner's job and revenue projections lacked adequate supporting detail, the HUBZone eligibility was questionable and its equivalence to economically depressed areas was not established, and the record did not show the proposed endeavor's impact would extend beyond direct customers and employees to the level of national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's job and revenue projections lacked adequate supporting detail, the HUBZone eligibility was questionable and its equivalence to economically depressed areas was not established, and the record did not show the proposed endeavor's impact would extend beyond direct customers and employees to the level of national importance. The shortage of engineering professionals does not independently render the endeavor nationally important.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_03_B5203; source_row=39997 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c