Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3321–3330
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner's failure on the first prong was dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner's failure on the first prong was dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_04_B5203; source_row=40002 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis consisted of conclusory statements insufficient for meaningful appellate review, and remanded without expressing an opinion on the ultimate merits.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis consisted of conclusory statements insufficient for meaningful appellate review, and remanded without expressing an opinion on the ultimate merits.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_02_B2203; source_row=39992 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
License to practice the profession or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why the evidence was persuasive
Although the Director erroneously cited dental/odontology credentials rather than nursing credentials, the Petitioner's nursing registration card with the Federal Counsel of Nursing satisfies the license/certification requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Director erroneously cited dental/odontology credentials rather than nursing credentials, the Petitioner's nursing registration card with the Federal Counsel of Nursing satisfies the license/certification requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=40010 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer letters either lacked specific start/end dates or failed to state whether the work was full or part time; together they accounted for only about three years of employment. The Digital Work Card lacked duty descriptions or full/part-time information. Letters from colleagues rather than employers do not satisfy the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letters either lacked specific start/end dates or failed to state whether the work was full or part time; together they accounted for only about three years of employment. The Digital Work Card lacked duty descriptions or full/part-time information. Letters from colleagues rather than employers do not satisfy the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=40009 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The support letters praised the Petitioner's nursing skills and contributions to patient care but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The support letters praised the Petitioner's nursing skills and contributions to patient care but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=40011 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not address missing author information on appeal, noted unresolved inconsistencies between the Annapurna Post and Annapurna National Daily in the editor's letter, and declined to consider new Wikipedia evidence offered for the first time on appeal after the Petitioner had been given an RFE opportunity to address these deficiencies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not address missing author information on appeal, noted unresolved inconsistencies between the Annapurna Post and Annapurna National Daily in the editor's letter, and declined to consider new Wikipedia evidence offered for the first time on appeal after the Petitioner had been given an RFE opportunity to address these deficiencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-15_01_B2203; source_row=39980 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c