Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's reliance on his credentials and experience addressed prong two rather than prong one, which requires showing the specific endeavor's prospective impact. The record lacked competent evidence that his training methods were recognized by the industry at large or had significant economic impact, and no financial or employment projections were provided to support claims of broader economic benefit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's reliance on his credentials and experience addressed prong two rather than prong one, which requires showing the specific endeavor's prospective impact. The record lacked competent evidence that his training methods were recognized by the industry at large or had significant economic impact, and no financial or employment projections were provided to support claims of broader economic benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_04_B5203; source_row=39933 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the 3-year Mexican military pilot degree was not shown to be equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree because no independent evaluation was submitted and EDGE indicates a 3-year Mexican degree equates to only three years of U.S. university study. The Honduran MBA diploma lacked a transcript or independent evaluation, so its claimed master's-level equivalency could not be verified.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the 3-year Mexican military pilot degree was not shown to be equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree because no independent evaluation was submitted and EDGE indicates a 3-year Mexican degree equates to only three years of U.S. university study. The Honduran MBA diploma lacked a transcript or independent evaluation, so its claimed master's-level equivalency could not be verified.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_04_B5203; source_row=39931 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance: the Petitioner relied on the broader industry's importance rather than her specific endeavor's prospective impact, the linked articles were not provided in printed form, the impact would be limited to direct employers, and her teaching activities do not broadly impact the field (citing Dhanasar's own teaching example).
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance: the Petitioner relied on the broader industry's importance rather than her specific endeavor's prospective impact, the linked articles were not provided in printed form, the impact would be limited to direct employers, and her teaching activities do not broadly impact the field (citing Dhanasar's own teaching example).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_05_B5203; source_row=39936 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found Petitioner failed to show broader implications beyond his clients or substantial positive economic effects rising to national importance; projections lacked sufficient corroborating detail and conflated industry importance with the specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found Petitioner failed to show broader implications beyond his clients or substantial positive economic effects rising to national importance; projections lacked sufficient corroborating detail and conflated industry importance with the specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_09_B5203; source_row=39963 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner had not established by a preponderance of the evidence that his methodology provides a new or unique approach that will lead to improved manufacturing processes or other nationally important outcomes.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner had not established by a preponderance of the evidence that his methodology provides a new or unique approach that will lead to improved manufacturing processes or other nationally important outcomes. The changing description of the methodology limited assessment of its potential prospective impact, and the Petitioner appeared to have adopted existing tools (PMBOK, DMAIC, PDCA) rather than developing a novel methodology. General arguments about affordable housing and construction industry waste were not accompanied by evidence of particularized national economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_11_B5203; source_row=39975 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters showed the Beneficiary was invited to give master classes and provide advice, suggestions, and critiques, but did not demonstrate actual participation as a judge of the work of others. The letters lacked specifics about who, when, and what was judged.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The letters showed the Beneficiary was invited to give master classes and provide advice, suggestions, and critiques, but did not demonstrate actual participation as a judge of the work of others. The letters lacked specifics about who, when, and what was judged.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=39904 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the regulation requires documentation of the alien's receipt of prizes or awards, and the Beneficiary never individually received any awards, the criterion is not met. The record also showed that individual contributors can be named in game awards, undermining the ensemble-work argument.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the regulation requires documentation of the alien's receipt of prizes or awards, and the Beneficiary never individually received any awards, the criterion is not met. The record also showed that individual contributors can be named in game awards, undermining the ensemble-work argument.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=39902 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner made unsupported assertions about the publications' rankings without providing corroborating evidence, so it failed to demonstrate that any digital or hardcover publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner made unsupported assertions about the publications' rankings without providing corroborating evidence, so it failed to demonstrate that any digital or hardcover publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=39903 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The comparative salary evidence was not pertaining to the Beneficiary's specific occupation as an 'Environment Concept Art Lead.' The Beneficiary's lead-level position with broader responsibilities requires comparison to other environment concept art leads, not to special effects artists, animators, or concept artists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The comparative salary evidence was not pertaining to the Beneficiary's specific occupation as an 'Environment Concept Art Lead.' The Beneficiary's lead-level position with broader responsibilities requires comparison to other environment concept art leads, not to special effects artists, animators, or concept artists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=39906 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c