Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3391–3400
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that while substantial merit was established, national importance was not. Projected employment of up to 18 people, modest financial projections relative to the industry, reference letters limited to individual client impact, and general unsubstantiated claims about government initiatives all failed to show the endeavor's prospective impact on the field at a national level.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that while substantial merit was established, national importance was not. Projected employment of up to 18 people, modest financial projections relative to the industry, reference letters limited to individual client impact, and general unsubstantiated claims about government initiatives all failed to show the endeavor's prospective impact on the field at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_06_B5203; source_row=39877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's filings inconsistently identified the proposed endeavor as either a wallpaper company, a transportation company, or a Treasurer/Controller role in finance, and on appeal continued to address both without explanation, making it impossible to find the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's filings inconsistently identified the proposed endeavor as either a wallpaper company, a transportation company, or a Treasurer/Controller role in finance, and on appeal continued to address both without explanation, making it impossible to find the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_12_B5203; source_row=39898 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Título de Tecnólogo is a two-to-three year undergraduate credential that does not constitute a bachelor's degree equivalent, and the credential evaluation improperly combined education with experience contrary to the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Título de Tecnólogo is a two-to-three year undergraduate credential that does not constitute a bachelor's degree equivalent, and the credential evaluation improperly combined education with experience contrary to the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_12_B5203; source_row=39896 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Petitioner's consulting services in medical sales and marketing lacked the prospective potential impact rising to the level of national importance — she did not show improvements to human knowledge, research outcomes, scientific advancements, or significant economic effects such as employing U.S. workers in economically depressed areas.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's consulting services in medical sales and marketing lacked the prospective potential impact rising to the level of national importance — she did not show improvements to human knowledge, research outcomes, scientific advancements, or significant economic effects such as employing U.S. workers in economically depressed areas. General assertions about the macroeconomic benefits of marketing and entrepreneurship were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_11_B5203; source_row=39893 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's appeal brief contained contradictory descriptions of the proposed endeavor — alternately describing it as a financial advisory firm, an accounting supervisor role, and a Mexico-focused business — that were irreconcilable with each other and with the submitted business plan, preventing a finding of substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's appeal brief contained contradictory descriptions of the proposed endeavor — alternately describing it as a financial advisory firm, an accounting supervisor role, and a Mexico-focused business — that were irreconcilable with each other and with the submitted business plan, preventing a finding of substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_08_B5203; source_row=39880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the diploma represents only vocational/specialized high school-level education per AACRAO EDGE, the transcripts show only three years of coursework, and neither the diploma nor the additional MBA course establishes a U.S. bachelor's degree equivalent. Experience cannot substitute for the degree requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the diploma represents only vocational/specialized high school-level education per AACRAO EDGE, the transcripts show only three years of coursework, and neither the diploma nor the additional MBA course establishes a U.S. bachelor's degree equivalent. Experience cannot substitute for the degree requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_02_B5203; source_row=39867 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner did not show her endeavor would have broader implications in the field, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or other substantial positive economic effects, and concluded that the evidence submitted did not satisfy the national importance aspect of the first prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not show her endeavor would have broader implications in the field, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or other substantial positive economic effects, and concluded that the evidence submitted did not satisfy the national importance aspect of the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_04_B5203; source_row=39871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO determined the Petitioner's CEO role at an environmental consulting company providing legal advice falls within the field of law, which requires an advanced degree, and her master's in law satisfies the regulatory definition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO determined the Petitioner's CEO role at an environmental consulting company providing legal advice falls within the field of law, which requires an advanced degree, and her master's in law satisfies the regulatory definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_14_B5203; source_row=39901 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Director concluded, and the AAO does not disturb, that the Petitioner's proposed environmental consulting endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Director concluded, and the AAO does not disturb, that the Petitioner's proposed environmental consulting endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_09_B5203; source_row=39883 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commanding a salary indicative of exceptional ability (criterion D)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. While AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director erred in comparing her Brazilian salary to U.S. median salary figures, AAO found the Petitioner also failed to provide evidence comparing her salary to peers in Brazil, so the criterion remained unsatisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. While AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director erred in comparing her Brazilian salary to U.S. median salary figures, AAO found the Petitioner also failed to provide evidence comparing her salary to peers in Brazil, so the criterion remained unsatisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-13_10_B5203; source_row=39888 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c