Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3421–3430
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate that her proposed endeavor would extend beyond her company and its clientele to have broader national implications. The business plan's projections for job creation and revenue lacked sufficient supporting detail, and the expert opinion letter's assertions were unsubstantiated.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate that her proposed endeavor would extend beyond her company and its clientele to have broader national implications. The business plan's projections for job creation and revenue lacked sufficient supporting detail, and the expert opinion letter's assertions were unsubstantiated. AAO also noted that the importance of the legal consulting industry generally is not the relevant inquiry; what matters is the specific prospective impact of the Petitioner's particular endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_06_B5203; source_row=39847 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding no evidence in the record reflecting that the Beneficiary made original contributions of major significance. The Director failed to explain or identify the evidence supporting this finding.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding no evidence in the record reflecting that the Beneficiary made original contributions of major significance. The Director failed to explain or identify the evidence supporting this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=39823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show national importance because the letters and other evidence did not demonstrate broader impact beyond prospective clients, nor significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show national importance because the letters and other evidence did not demonstrate broader impact beyond prospective clients, nor significant potential for U.S. job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=39826 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's endeavor — improving nutrition and overall health of people in the U.S. through clinical work, combating misinformation, and collaborating with partners — lacked the broader implications required for national importance under Dhanasar.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's endeavor — improving nutrition and overall health of people in the U.S. through clinical work, combating misinformation, and collaborating with partners — lacked the broader implications required for national importance under Dhanasar. While her patients and partners may find her work valuable, the Petitioner did not show implications within her field, improvement of human knowledge, research outcomes, scientific advancements, or a particularized economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_04_B5203; source_row=39842 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the evidence focused on the Petitioner's qualifications (relevant to prong 2) rather than the prospective impact of the endeavor, and did not show employment of U.S. workers, substantial economic effects, or broader industry-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the evidence focused on the Petitioner's qualifications (relevant to prong 2) rather than the prospective impact of the endeavor, and did not show employment of U.S. workers, substantial economic effects, or broader industry-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_09_B5203; source_row=39852 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds the Petitioner improperly relies on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor's prospective impact, and the projected employment of 16 direct/34 indirect jobs and policy advocacy lack independent evidence of broader impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds the Petitioner improperly relies on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor's prospective impact, and the projected employment of 16 direct/34 indirect jobs and policy advocacy lack independent evidence of broader impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_02_B5203; source_row=39836 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The policy manual requires at least a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent; experience alone cannot substitute. The credential evaluator's reliance on the 'three-for-one' rule is inapplicable to immigrant employment petitions, making the evaluation of little probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The policy manual requires at least a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent; experience alone cannot substitute. The credential evaluator's reliance on the 'three-for-one' rule is inapplicable to immigrant employment petitions, making the evaluation of little probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_05_B5203; source_row=39845 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
What the decision said
The AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the three-criterion threshold regardless of the outcome on criterion (v), making it unnecessary to reach.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the three-criterion threshold regardless of the outcome on criterion (v), making it unnecessary to reach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-12_02_B2203; source_row=39832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c