Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3561–3570
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
license or certification
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not show that a license or certification is required to be employed as a computer systems analyst. The certifications may aid employability but are not shown to be required for the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not show that a license or certification is required to be employed as a computer systems analyst. The certifications may aid employability but are not shown to be required for the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_04_B5203; source_row=39639 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Evidence of membership in professional associations
What the decision said
AAO declined to review this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria given failures on (A), (C), (D), and (F).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to review this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria given failures on (A), (C), (D), and (F).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_04_B5203; source_row=39641 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
At least ten years of full-time work experience in the occupation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met this criterion; no further discussion was warranted as both parties accepted this finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the Director's finding that the Petitioner met this criterion; no further discussion was warranted as both parties accepted this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_04_B5203; source_row=39638 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_01_B2203; source_row=39626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the substantial merit sub-element but failed to establish national importance. The submitted publications addressed patents generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor, the client letters showed benefits only to individual clients rather than broader field impact, and the Petitioner's own patents were relevant to the second prong (being well-position…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the substantial merit sub-element but failed to establish national importance. The submitted publications addressed patents generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor, the client letters showed benefits only to individual clients rather than broader field impact, and the Petitioner's own patents were relevant to the second prong (being well-positioned) rather than the national importance of his proposed endeavor as an attorney.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-02_01_B5203; source_row=39605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c