Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3691–3700
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agrees that Petitioner held leading roles with his current employer, an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees that Petitioner held leading roles with his current employer, an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=39447 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO does not separately reach this criterion at step 1, electing to evaluate the awards evidence as part of the final merits determination since three criteria were already met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not separately reach this criterion at step 1, electing to evaluate the awards evidence as part of the final merits determination since three criteria were already met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-30_01_B2203; source_row=39442 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had substantial merit but found she failed to establish national importance. The submitted articles addressed cloud computing and cybersecurity generally but did not discuss the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had substantial merit but found she failed to establish national importance. The submitted articles addressed cloud computing and cybersecurity generally but did not discuss the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. Letters of recommendation praised her qualifications but did not demonstrate that her work would extend beyond individual employers to have broader national or global implications for her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B5203; source_row=39411 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record lacked adequate corroborating evidence that the Petitioner's marketing services business would have broader implications in his field or substantial positive economic effects at a national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked adequate corroborating evidence that the Petitioner's marketing services business would have broader implications in his field or substantial positive economic effects at a national level. The economic projections (RIMS II, business plan) were insufficiently detailed and unsupported, and the Petitioner conflated the importance of the marketing industry generally with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_06_B5203; source_row=39420 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded that geographic reach does not equate to national importance; the consulting services are individualized to specific clients and the Petitioner failed to show how innovations would be disseminated more broadly or that indirect economic effects would substantially impact the regional or national economy.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that geographic reach does not equate to national importance; the consulting services are individualized to specific clients and the Petitioner failed to show how innovations would be disseminated more broadly or that indirect economic effects would substantially impact the regional or national economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_13_B5203; source_row=39435 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that LARAS membership requirements are based on volume of recordings and distributions, not outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner's argument that meeting these requirements is itself a feat was unsubstantiated. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that LARAS uses nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements of prospective members.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that LARAS membership requirements are based on volume of recordings and distributions, not outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner's argument that meeting these requirements is itself a feat was unsubstantiated. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that LARAS uses nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements of prospective members.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=39406 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the business plan's financial projections were unsupported and contained discrepancies (e.g., projecting $60,000 total for five project managers earning $60,000 each), and that the cultural ripple effects of the body-positive movement did not extend beyond a narrow area to constitute national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the business plan's financial projections were unsupported and contained discrepancies (e.g., projecting $60,000 total for five project managers earning $60,000 each), and that the cultural ripple effects of the body-positive movement did not extend beyond a narrow area to constitute national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_07_B5203; source_row=39423 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c