Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3711–3720
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reopen Requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify any new facts or submit documentary evidence of such facts, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify any new facts or submit documentary evidence of such facts, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_12_B5203; source_row=39433 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reconsider Requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish that the prior AAO decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, did not specifically identify evidence or errors in AAO's analysis, and did not explain how the decision violated Fourth Amendment rights.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish that the prior AAO decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, did not specifically identify evidence or errors in AAO's analysis, and did not explain how the decision violated Fourth Amendment rights.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_12_B5203; source_row=39434 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the Step 1 threshold, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the Step 1 threshold, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=39410 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that only two of the submitted articles even mentioned the Petitioner's name, and neither was about him — one was about the band's receipt of silver medals and the other about an award given to an orchestra — with the Petitioner's name merely listed among other band members. AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that only two of the submitted articles even mentioned the Petitioner's name, and neither was about him — one was about the band's receipt of silver medals and the other about an award given to an orchestra — with the Petitioner's name merely listed among other band members. AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=39407 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director did not adequately justify why these awards were not issued for excellence in the field and reversed, concluding the Silver Medal awards were sufficient to meet this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director did not adequately justify why these awards were not issued for excellence in the field and reversed, concluding the Silver Medal awards were sufficient to meet this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=39405 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the CEO letter made broad claims without providing specific details to differentiate the Petitioner's role from other band members, and the Record Deal Memorandum showed only that he would serve as Principal Trumpeter on an unspecified album with no evidence the album was ever created.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the CEO letter made broad claims without providing specific details to differentiate the Petitioner's role from other band members, and the Record Deal Memorandum showed only that he would serve as Principal Trumpeter on an unspecified album with no evidence the album was ever created.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=39409 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c