Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3721–3730
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's projected $8.94 million revenue and 35 jobs over five years are dwarfed by the $236.2 billion construction management industry, the industry reports speak to the field generally not the specific endeavor, and the Petitioner failed to show broader implications for his field or the U.S. economy beyond his local business operations.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's projected $8.94 million revenue and 35 jobs over five years are dwarfed by the $236.2 billion construction management industry, the industry reports speak to the field generally not the specific endeavor, and the Petitioner failed to show broader implications for his field or the U.S. economy beyond his local business operations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_05_B5203; source_row=39417 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record did not show that any of the three organizations require members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, and so they were not shown to be professional associations under the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not show that any of the three organizations require members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent, and so they were not shown to be professional associations under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-29_14_B5203; source_row=39438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that substantial merit was met but found the Petitioner failed to establish national importance because the evidence—industry articles, recommendation letters, and authored pieces—addressed the importance of oil and gas/economics generally rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor, and none showed his work would extend beyond individual employers or clients to impact the field more broa…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that substantial merit was met but found the Petitioner failed to establish national importance because the evidence—industry articles, recommendation letters, and authored pieces—addressed the importance of oil and gas/economics generally rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor, and none showed his work would extend beyond individual employers or clients to impact the field more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_02_B5203; source_row=39390 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO acknowledged that IT consulting and web design training services are valuable and in demand, but found the Petitioner failed to show that his endeavor's impact would be significant enough to reach national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO acknowledged that IT consulting and web design training services are valuable and in demand, but found the Petitioner failed to show that his endeavor's impact would be significant enough to reach national importance. The record did not establish that the benefits would extend beyond his own customers and employees to affect the IT industry more broadly, and pursuing a STEM-related endeavor does not automatically establish national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_01_B5203; source_row=39387 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit evidence that the association requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts, and that the Baidu Baike article lacked reliability and in any case described only a regionally scoped organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit evidence that the association requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts, and that the Baidu Baike article lacked reliability and in any case described only a regionally scoped organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=39383 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to provide circulation data to establish the publications qualify as professional, major trade, or major media, even after the Director specifically requested that information. New submissions post-dating the petition filing were not material.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to provide circulation data to establish the publications qualify as professional, major trade, or major media, even after the Director specifically requested that information. New submissions post-dating the petition filing were not material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=39384 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed the submitted articles do not establish that finishing fourth in the competition constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, and noted petitioner's statements in the brief are not evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the submitted articles do not establish that finishing fourth in the competition constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, and noted petitioner's statements in the brief are not evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=39382 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. General articles about entrepreneurship and small businesses did not relate specifically to the Petitioner's endeavor; business plan revenue and job projections lacked evidentiary basis and did not rise to 'substantial positive economic effects'; the expert letter focused on the Petitioner's expertise rather than the endeavor's broader national impact; and client l…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. General articles about entrepreneurship and small businesses did not relate specifically to the Petitioner's endeavor; business plan revenue and job projections lacked evidentiary basis and did not rise to 'substantial positive economic effects'; the expert letter focused on the Petitioner's expertise rather than the endeavor's broader national impact; and client letters addressed personal attributes rather than prospective national impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_05_B5203; source_row=39399 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c