Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3731–3740
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the projected impact speculative and unsupported by specific job-creation forecasts tied to the Petitioner's endeavor. The consulting work would not extend beyond the Petitioner's clientele to impact the consulting or accounting industries broadly.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the projected impact speculative and unsupported by specific job-creation forecasts tied to the Petitioner's endeavor. The consulting work would not extend beyond the Petitioner's clientele to impact the consulting or accounting industries broadly. The business plan's projected 11 employees and associated tax revenue were not shown to be significant in Florida, Texas, or nationally, and the expert opinion did not provide a specific analysis of that significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_04_B5203; source_row=39396 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the oil and gas industry is nationally important, the Petitioner failed to show that his specific work as a project manager would have implications beyond the single company for which he intends to work, did not demonstrate original innovations with broader field-wide implications, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the oil and gas industry is nationally important, the Petitioner failed to show that his specific work as a project manager would have implications beyond the single company for which he intends to work, did not demonstrate original innovations with broader field-wide implications, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects. AAO also noted the Petitioner had not worked since 2013, further undermining the relevance of his experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_03_B5203; source_row=39393 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO reserved this criterion because a decision on it cannot change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner's failure to meet any of the other three contested criteria.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved this criterion because a decision on it cannot change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner's failure to meet any of the other three contested criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=39385 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
The AAO found the Director failed to analyze the full scope of the proposed endeavor, including the Petitioner's intention to expand her portfolio of technologies and develop new ones, and did not meaningfully consider a significant portion of the submitted evidence. The matter is remanded for proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Director failed to analyze the full scope of the proposed endeavor, including the Petitioner's intention to expand her portfolio of technologies and develop new ones, and did not meaningfully consider a significant portion of the submitted evidence. The matter is remanded for proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=39402 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
The AAO found the Director's decision contained no separate section analyzing prong two, rendering the basis for the denial unclear and preventing meaningful appellate review. The matter is remanded for a proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Director's decision contained no separate section analyzing prong two, rendering the basis for the denial unclear and preventing meaningful appellate review. The matter is remanded for a proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=39403 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
The AAO found the Director's prong-three determination was unsupported by analysis, failed to discuss specific evidence, and failed to address the Petitioner's arguments. The matter is remanded for proper evaluation of all Dhanasar third-prong factors.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Director's prong-three determination was unsupported by analysis, failed to discuss specific evidence, and failed to address the Petitioner's arguments. The matter is remanded for proper evaluation of all Dhanasar third-prong factors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=39404 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director, finding the record lacks sufficient information to show the Petitioner commanded a salary demonstrating exceptional ability, noting ambiguity in whether the comparison document referred to monthly or annual salaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, finding the record lacks sufficient information to show the Petitioner commanded a salary demonstrating exceptional ability, noting ambiguity in whether the comparison document referred to monthly or annual salaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-25_03_B5203; source_row=39354 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c