Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3861–3870
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance because she relied primarily on general importance of small businesses and AI rather than specific, corroborated evidence that her particular endeavor would produce substantial positive economic effects. Her conclusory statements and business plan, without independent objective evidence, were insufficient to establish the required national-level impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance because she relied primarily on general importance of small businesses and AI rather than specific, corroborated evidence that her particular endeavor would produce substantial positive economic effects. Her conclusory statements and business plan, without independent objective evidence, were insufficient to establish the required national-level impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_05_B5203; source_row=39181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO previously concluded that the record does not establish how the prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance rather than only impacting his clients. On motion, no new facts were submitted to overcome this finding.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO previously concluded that the record does not establish how the prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance rather than only impacting his clients. On motion, no new facts were submitted to overcome this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_07_B5203; source_row=39190 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not separately analyze prong 3 on motion, but affirmed that no new facts were submitted to overcome the dismissal of the appeal on all three Dhanasar prongs.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately analyze prong 3 on motion, but affirmed that no new facts were submitted to overcome the dismissal of the appeal on all three Dhanasar prongs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_07_B5203; source_row=39192 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the complete BLS Handbook entry and O*NET data indicate that a bachelor's degree is not the minimum requirement for entry into 'facilities manager' positions, and rejected the Petitioner's claim that O*NET lacks government authority.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the complete BLS Handbook entry and O*NET data indicate that a bachelor's degree is not the minimum requirement for entry into 'facilities manager' positions, and rejected the Petitioner's claim that O*NET lacks government authority.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_07_B5203; source_row=39189 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the Petitioner failed to show how his consulting work would have broader implications or substantial economic impact at a level of national importance. The submitted documentation shows only impact on the firm's employees, clients, and business partners.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Petitioner failed to show how his consulting work would have broader implications or substantial economic impact at a level of national importance. The submitted documentation shows only impact on the firm's employees, clients, and business partners.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_02_B5203; source_row=39168 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the evidence did not demonstrate broader implications of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor at a level of national importance, and that the Petitioner's employer's economic impact in Florida did not establish his specific endeavor's potential to employ U.S. workers or have a substantial positive economic effect.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the evidence did not demonstrate broader implications of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor at a level of national importance, and that the Petitioner's employer's economic impact in Florida did not establish his specific endeavor's potential to employ U.S. workers or have a substantial positive economic effect.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=39161 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to fully conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to fully conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=39160 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c