Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3911–3920
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
salary or other renumeration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding or submit related documentation, so AAO concurred the criterion was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding or submit related documentation, so AAO concurred the criterion was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_14_B5203; source_row=39152 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to reach this issue because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar prong one, making any ruling on exceptional ability qualification unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this issue because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar prong one, making any ruling on exceptional ability qualification unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_03_B5203; source_row=39108 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledged the merit of special needs and bilingual education but found the Petitioner failed to show her specific endeavor would have broader national or global implications. Teacher shortages do not make an endeavor nationally important under Dhanasar, and the Petitioner's racial diversity contribution would not extend beyond her own school.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the merit of special needs and bilingual education but found the Petitioner failed to show her specific endeavor would have broader national or global implications. Teacher shortages do not make an endeavor nationally important under Dhanasar, and the Petitioner's racial diversity contribution would not extend beyond her own school. The Petitioner also did not allege positive economic effects or significant potential to employ U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_03_B5203; source_row=39109 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
at least ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the employment records showed only five to six years of service, inconsistent with one employer letter claiming over eight years, and neither figure reached the ten-year minimum. The new letter from a former colleague did not supply employer verification of dates. The Petitioner also failed to acknowledge on appeal that the criterion requires ten years, not five.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the employment records showed only five to six years of service, inconsistent with one employer letter claiming over eight years, and neither figure reached the ten-year minimum. The new letter from a former colleague did not supply employer verification of dates. The Petitioner also failed to acknowledge on appeal that the criterion requires ten years, not five.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_09_B5203; source_row=39126 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional organizations
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet two of the three claimed criteria and could not satisfy the requisite minimum of three regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet two of the three claimed criteria and could not satisfy the requisite minimum of three regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_09_B5203; source_row=39127 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-2 categorical eligibility (advanced degree or exceptional ability)
What the decision said
AAO withdrew the Director's categorical ineligibility finding because the Director failed to seek evidence on advanced degree eligibility, and the record was ambiguous as to the length of the degree program. Since the Dhanasar analysis was dispositive, AAO reserved full analysis for future proceedings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's categorical ineligibility finding because the Director failed to seek evidence on advanced degree eligibility, and the record was ambiguous as to the length of the degree program. Since the Dhanasar analysis was dispositive, AAO reserved full analysis for future proceedings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=39086 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c