Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 3951–3960
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, which was dispositive.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, which was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_03_B5203; source_row=39044 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineerPhD60 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found at step one that the Petitioner's quality control methodologies, adopted in the AFS Mold and Core Test Handbook and implemented broadly across the U.S. casting industry, satisfied this criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found at step one that the Petitioner's quality control methodologies, adopted in the AFS Mold and Core Test Handbook and implemented broadly across the U.S. casting industry, satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=39032 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
license to practice the profession or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Nevada CDL had expired in 2017 and the Washington driver license was not for a profession or occupation, so the Petitioner did not establish he holds a license to practice a profession.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Nevada CDL had expired in 2017 and the Washington driver license was not for a profession or occupation, so the Petitioner did not establish he holds a license to practice a profession.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_11_B5203; source_row=39065 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
Memberships were issued to the business rather than the Petitioner individually, and the record did not show that AMSA or WMC requires a U.S. bachelor's degree (or equivalent) for membership such that they constitute professional associations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Memberships were issued to the business rather than the Petitioner individually, and the record did not show that AMSA or WMC requires a U.S. bachelor's degree (or equivalent) for membership such that they constitute professional associations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_11_B5203; source_row=39066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
National importance (clause of first prong)
What the decision said
AAO reserved consideration of the national importance clause because it found the substantial merit element of prong 1 was not met, making it unnecessary to reach national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved consideration of the national importance clause because it found the substantial merit element of prong 1 was not met, making it unnecessary to reach national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_04_B5203; source_row=39047 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the proposed endeavor vaguely described such that its nature could not be discerned, the evidence (including a letter from a prospective partner and general articles) did not show how the Petitioner's specific endeavor would accomplish its stated goals, and the Petitioner's voluntary dissolution of B- LLC while the petition was pending was inconsistent with his stated intent and unexplained.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the proposed endeavor vaguely described such that its nature could not be discerned, the evidence (including a letter from a prospective partner and general articles) did not show how the Petitioner's specific endeavor would accomplish its stated goals, and the Petitioner's voluntary dissolution of B- LLC while the petition was pending was inconsistent with his stated intent and unexplained.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-16_04_B5203; source_row=39046 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c