Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4061–4070
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the endeavor
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach prong two as the first-prong determination was dispositive.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach prong two as the first-prong determination was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_08_B5203; source_row=38868 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, though it noted in passing that the record did not support the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, though it noted in passing that the record did not support the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_04_B2203; source_row=38857 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate prospective national-level impact. The business plan, reference and expert letters, and online publications did not address her specific proposed undertaking. She also failed to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate prospective national-level impact. The business plan, reference and expert letters, and online publications did not address her specific proposed undertaking. She also failed to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_02_B5203; source_row=38839 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_02_B5203; source_row=38840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_02_B5203; source_row=38841 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor appeared limited to the Petitioner's current position as a data programmer analyst at his current employer, with impact limited to that employer and its patients. The Petitioner's evidence of economic effects was too general to show substantial positive economic impact, and his citation count of 48 was not placed in context showing it exceeded field norms.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor appeared limited to the Petitioner's current position as a data programmer analyst at his current employer, with impact limited to that employer and its patients. The Petitioner's evidence of economic effects was too general to show substantial positive economic impact, and his citation count of 48 was not placed in context showing it exceeded field norms. The supporting letters addressed past work rather than the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=38828 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c